RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 213.Signing Pleadings, Motions, and Other Papers; Representations to the Court; Sanctions

Part II. Pleadings · Last amended July 1, 2021 · Last verified September 4, 2026

In one sentenceRule 213 requires every filing to be signed, makes the signature a certification, and gives a 21-day safe harbor before a sanctions motion may be filed.

Full Text of Rule 213

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b) (c) (d)

(a) Signature. Every pleading, written motion, and other paper must be signed by at least one attorney of record licensed in the state of Idaho, in the individual attorney’s name, or by a party personally if the party is unrepresented. The paper must state the signer's address, e-mail address, and telephone number. Unless a rule or statute specifically states otherwise, a pleading need not be verified or accompanied by an affidavit. The court must strike an unsigned paper unless the omission is promptly corrected after being called to the attorney's or party's attention.
(1) Electronic Signature. An electronic signature may be used on any document that is transmitted electronically, and a notary’s seal may be in electronic form.
(2) In civil protection order actions, the petitioner may omit his address, phone number, or email address on the petition or application so long as this information has been included on the family law case information sheet.
(b) Representations to the Court. By presenting to the court a pleading, written motion, or other paper, whether by signing, filing, or submitting, or later advocating it, an attorney or unrepresented party certifies that to the best of the person's knowledge, information, and belief, formed after an inquiry reasonable under the circumstances:
(1) it is not being presented for any improper purpose, such as to harass, cause unnecessary delay, or needlessly increase the cost of litigation;
(2) the claims, defenses, and other legal contentions are warranted by existing law or by a nonfrivolous argument for extending, modifying, or reversing existing law or for establishing new law;
(3) the factual contentions have evidentiary support or, if specifically so identified, will likely have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery; and
(4) the denials of factual contentions are warranted on the evidence or, if specifically so identified, are reasonably based on belief or a lack of information.
(c) Sanctions.
(1) In General. If, after notice and a reasonable opportunity to respond, the court determines that subsection (b) has been violated, the court must impose an appropriate sanction on any attorney, law firm, or party that violated the rule or is responsible for the violation. A law firm may be held jointly responsible for a violation committed by its partner, associate, or employee.
(2) Motion for Sanctions. A motion for sanctions must be made separately from any other motion and must describe the specific conduct that allegedly violates subsection (b). The motion must be served under Rule 205, but it must not be filed or be presented to the court if the challenged paper, claim, defense, contention, or denial is withdrawn or appropriately corrected within 21 days after service or within another time the court sets. If warranted, the court may award to the prevailing party on the motion, reasonable expenses, including attorney fees and costs incurred for the motion.
(3) On the Court’s Initiative. On its own, the court may order an attorney, law firm, or party to show cause why conduct specifically described in the order has not violated subsection(b).
(4) Nature of the Sanction. The sanction imposed under this rule may include an order to pay to the other party or parties the amount of the reasonable expenses incurred because of the filing of the pleading, motion, or other paper, including reasonable attorney fees. The sanction may also include nonmonetary directives.
(5) Vexatious Litigant. In addition to any other sanction available under this rule, the court may also refer to the administrative district judge the question of whether to declare a person to be a vexatious litigant pursuant to I.C.A.R. 59 and for relief under that rule.
(6) Requirements for an Order. An order imposing a sanction must describe the sanctioned conduct and explain the basis for the sanction.
(d) Inapplicability to Discovery. This rule does not apply to disclosures and discovery requests, responses, objections, and motions under Part IV. Disclosure, Discovery, and Subpoena sections of these rules.
End

Rule History

(Adopted March 29, 2021, effective July 1, 2021.)

Plain-English Summary

Rule 213 is Idaho family law's signature and sanctions rule.

Signature

Every pleading, written motion and other paper must be signed by at least one attorney of record licensed in Idaho, in that attorney's own name, or personally by an unrepresented party, and must state the signer's address, email and telephone number. Unless a rule or statute says otherwise, a pleading need not be verified or accompanied by an affidavit. The court must strike an unsigned paper unless the omission is promptly corrected once pointed out.

Electronic signatures may be used on any document transmitted electronically, and a notary's seal may be electronic. In civil protection order actions the petitioner may omit address, phone or email so long as it appears on the family law case information sheet.

What signing certifies

By presenting a paper — by signing, filing, submitting, or later advocating it — an attorney or unrepresented party certifies, after an inquiry reasonable under the circumstances, that it is not presented for an improper purpose such as harassment, delay, or needlessly increasing cost; that the legal contentions are warranted by existing law or a nonfrivolous argument to change it; that factual contentions have evidentiary support, or are identified as likely to after further investigation; and that denials are warranted on the evidence or identified as based on belief or lack of information.

Note "later advocating." A position that becomes untenable cannot keep being urged.

Sanctions, and the safe harbor

On finding a violation after notice and a reasonable opportunity to respond, the court must impose an appropriate sanction on the attorney, law firm or party responsible — and a law firm may be held jointly responsible for its partner's, associate's or employee's violation.

A motion for sanctions must be made separately from any other motion and describe the specific conduct. It is served under Rule 205 but must not be filed or presented to the court if the challenged paper, claim, defense, contention or denial is withdrawn or appropriately corrected within 21 days after service, or within another time the court sets. That 21-day window is the safe harbor: the motion must be served first and filed only if the problem is not fixed. The court may award the prevailing party on the motion its reasonable expenses, including attorney fees and costs.

The court may also act on its own by ordering a party to show cause. A sanction may include payment of the other party's reasonable expenses and attorney fees, and nonmonetary directives. Any order imposing a sanction must describe the conduct and explain the basis.

Two boundaries

The court may refer to the administrative district judge the question whether to declare a person a vexatious litigant under I.C.A.R. 59. And this rule does not apply to disclosures and discovery — requests, responses, objections and motions under Part IV, which has its own sanctions in Rule 417.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does signing a filing certify?

Rule 213(b) certifies, after reasonable inquiry, that the paper is not presented for an improper purpose, that legal contentions are warranted by existing law or a nonfrivolous argument to change it, that factual contentions have or will likely have evidentiary support, and that denials are warranted on the evidence.

Do I have to warn the other side before moving for sanctions?

Yes. Rule 213(c)(2) requires the motion to be served but not filed if the challenged paper, claim, defense, contention or denial is withdrawn or appropriately corrected within 21 days after service or another time the court sets.

Can a law firm be sanctioned for a lawyer's conduct?

Rule 213(c)(1) allows a law firm to be held jointly responsible for a violation committed by its partner, associate or employee.

Does this rule cover discovery abuse?

No. Rule 213(d) excludes disclosures and discovery requests, responses, objections and motions under Part IV, which are governed by Rule 417.

Does a pleading have to be verified?

Not usually. Rule 213(a) provides that unless a rule or statute specifically states otherwise, a pleading need not be verified or accompanied by an affidavit.

What is a vexatious litigant referral?

Rule 213(c)(5) allows the court, in addition to any other sanction, to refer to the administrative district judge the question whether to declare a person a vexatious litigant pursuant to I.C.A.R. 59.

Source & verification. Rule text and Rule History reproduced verbatim from the Idaho Rules of Family Law Procedure as published by the Idaho Supreme Court, current through amendments effective July 1, 2026. Promulgated by the Supreme Court of Idaho (Idaho Const. art. V, sec. 25). Last verified September 4, 2026. · Official text
Also known as: signaturesigning pleadingssanctionssafe harbor21 dayscertificationfrivolousvexatious litigantelectronic signature