Rule 2.1.Compliance with Rules.
Current through July 1, 2026 · Last verified September 11, 2026
Full Text of Rule 2.1
Amendment History
(Amended March 30, 2022, effective April 25, 2022.)
Plain-English Summary
A short enforcement provision covering all three of the rule sets that govern a family court file. Non-compliance with these rules, with the Hawaii Electronic Filing and Services Rules, or with the Hawaii Court Records Rules may draw sanctions.
The rule points to two places for the menu of sanctions: the discovery sanctions in Rule 37(b)(2) and the general sanctions power in Rule 89. Both are named as examples rather than limits, since the text reads "including but not limited to". A court is not confined to the listed sanctions when the conduct calls for something else.
What the rule does not supply is a procedure. There is no motion requirement, no notice period and no safe harbour here, so a party facing a sanctions request looks to the rule the sanction is drawn from.
Frequently Asked Questions
What can a Hawaii family court sanction a party for?
Non-compliance with the Family Court Rules, the Hawaii Electronic Filing and Services Rules, or the Hawaii Court Records Rules.
Which sanctions are available?
Does Rule 2.1 set out a procedure for imposing sanctions?
No. It supplies the authority. Procedure comes from the rule the particular sanction is drawn from.
Can a filing error draw a sanction?
It can. The rule reaches non-compliance with the electronic filing rules and the court records rules, not only with the rules in this set.