RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

The Oklahoma motion to compel: a statute, and fees run both ways

Oklahoma procedure · Last verified August 17, 2026

Oklahoma runs discovery by statute rather than by court rule. The provision is title 12, section 3237 of the Oklahoma Statutes, and it sits in the discovery code alongside § 3233 (interrogatories) and § 3234 (production).

Two features shape practice: a certification requirement, and an expense award that is mandatory in both directions.

The certification

12 O.S. § 3237(A) requires the motion to include a certification that the movant has in good faith conferred or attempted to confer with the party failing to make discovery, in an effort to obtain it without court action.

"Conferred or attempted to confer" — the attempt suffices where the other side will not engage, but it must be certified.

Where to file

§ 3237(A) provides that a motion relating to a deposition:

shall be made to the district court in the county where the deposition is being taken or to the court in which the action is pending.

For deposition matters you have a choice between the county where the deposition is being taken and the court where the action is pending. Other discovery motions go to the court where the action is pending.

§ 3237(B) carries the matching contempt provision: a deponent who fails to be sworn or answer "after being directed to do so by the court in the county in which the deposition is being taken" may be held in contempt of that court.

What can be compelled

Section 3237(A) carries the familiar grounds — a deponent who fails to answer, a corporation that fails to designate, a party that fails to answer an interrogatory, and a party that fails to respond to or permit inspection — together with the standard evasive-answer provision: an evasive or incomplete answer is treated as a failure to answer.

Fees, both ways, both mandatory

Oklahoma is symmetric: the award is mandatory when the motion is granted and mandatory when it is denied, subject in each case to substantial justification or other circumstances making an award unjust, and reaching the party or the attorney advising the conduct.

That combination — certification required, plus a mandatory award against a losing movant — means the conference is worth doing properly. It is both a precondition to the motion and the evidence on which substantial justification will be judged.

Once an order is disobeyed

§ 3237(B) supplies the sanctions — deemed-established facts, preclusion, striking pleadings, staying proceedings, dismissal, default judgment and contempt.

Before you file

  1. Confirm proper service and that the response period has run — see responding to an Oklahoma complaint for the case timetable.
  2. Confer and certify it.
  3. For a deposition dispute, choose your forum — the deposition county or the court where the action is pending.
  4. Quote the evasive-answer provision where the response was thin rather than absent.
  5. Weigh the downside. A denied motion carries a mandatory award against you.

If judgment has already gone against you, Oklahoma's post-trial route runs on its own clock — see the Oklahoma motion for new trial.

How Oklahoma compares

OklahomaKansasArkansasFederal
Court rules or statutesstatutes, 12 O.S.statutescourt rulescourt rules
Conference certification requiredyesyesyesyes
Choice of forum for a depositionyesnonono
Fees when grantedshallmustshallmust
Fees when deniedshallmaymaymust
Award reaches the advising attorneyyesyesyesyes

A short checklist

  1. Certify the conference in the motion.
  2. Pick the forum for a deposition dispute; other motions go where the action is pending.
  3. Quote the evasive-answer provision.
  4. Build the substantial-justification record before filing — a denied motion is mandatory against you.
  5. Name the advising attorney where the facts support it.
  6. For a deposition refusal, contempt lies with the deposition county.

Where these rules live

This page explains what the statutes say. It isn't legal advice, and what makes an opposition substantially justified is developed in case law this site doesn't cover.

How this guide is sourced. Every procedural statement here is drawn from the text of the rules named above, each of which is reproduced verbatim on its own page on this site. Quoted rule language appears in quotation marks or block quotes; everything else is original writing. Last verified August 17, 2026.
This page explains what the rules say. It is legal information, not legal advice, and it cannot tell you how a rule applies to your situation. Deadlines are often short and some are not extendable — if the outcome matters, talk to a lawyer or your court’s self-help center.