RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Vacating a Kentucky judgment: six grounds, three of which expire in a year

Kentucky procedure · Last verified August 17, 2026

Kentucky packs its whole post-judgment relief scheme into one paragraph. CR 60.02 has six grounds lettered (a) through (f), two separate timing rules, and a sentence at the end that catches people who assume filing the motion buys them breathing room.

It does not.

The six grounds

Ky. CR 60.02:

On motion a court may, upon such terms as are just, relieve a party or his legal representative from its final judgment, order, or proceeding upon the following grounds: (a) mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect; (b) newly discovered evidence which by due diligence could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under Rule 59.02; (c) perjury or falsified evidence; (d) fraud affecting the proceedings, other than perjury or falsified evidence; (e) the judgment is void, or has been satisfied, released, or discharged, or a prior judgment upon which it is based has been reversed or otherwise vacated, or it is no longer equitable that the judgment should have prospective application; or (f) any other reason of an extraordinary nature justifying relief.

Kentucky splits fraud in a way most states do not. (c) is perjury or falsified evidence; (d) is fraud affecting the proceedings, other than perjury or falsified evidence. They are separate grounds with different deadlines, so the characterization matters.

Note also the wording of (f): not merely "any other reason justifying relief," but "any other reason of an extraordinary nature justifying relief." Kentucky's catch-all is expressly narrower than the federal one.

Two clocks

The next sentence sets both:

The motion shall be made within a reasonable time, and on grounds (a), (b), and (c) not more than one year after the judgment, order, or proceeding was entered or taken.

GroundOuter limit
(a) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, excusable neglect1 year
(b) newly discovered evidence1 year
(c) perjury or falsified evidence1 year
(d) fraud affecting the proceedingsreasonable time only
(e) void, satisfied, released, discharged, or no longer equitablereasonable time only
(f) any other reason of an extraordinary naturereasonable time only

The one-year cap covers (a), (b) and (c) — and notice that (d) fraud is not in that list. This is where the (c)/(d) distinction earns its keep: perjury and falsified evidence are time-barred at a year, while other fraud affecting the proceedings is not.

A void judgment under (e) is likewise not subject to the one year.

But every ground is subject to "within a reasonable time." The one-year cap is a ceiling, not a license to wait.

Filing does not stop the judgment

The last sentence of CR 60.02:

A motion under this rule does not affect the finality of a judgment or suspend its operation.

The judgment stays final and stays enforceable while the motion is pending. If collection has started, a separate application is needed to stop it — the motion alone will not.

Default judgments route through the same rule

Ky. CR 55.02 is a single sentence and it hands off:

For good cause shown the court may set aside a judgment by default in accordance with Rule 60.02.

So a default judgment is not set aside on a free-standing "good cause" standard in Kentucky. Good cause must be shown in accordance with Rule 60.02 — which means identifying one of the six grounds and respecting its deadline. In practice a defaulting defendant is usually in ground (a), and therefore inside the one-year cap.

The independent action

Ky. CR 60.03 preserves an older route and then closes an obvious loophole:

Rule 60.02 shall not limit the power of any court to entertain an independent action to relieve a person from a judgment, order or proceeding on appropriate equitable grounds. Relief shall not be granted in an independent action if the ground of relief sought has been denied in a proceeding by motion under Rule 60.02, or would be barred because not brought in time under the provisions of that rule.

The second sentence is the important one. An independent action is not a way around a missed CR 60.02 deadline, and it is not a second attempt at a ground already denied. If the motion would have been out of time, the independent action fails on the same basis.

How Kentucky compares

KentuckyColoradoNevadaFederal
Outer limit, mistake / excusable neglect1 year182 days6 months1 year
Perjury treated separately from other fraudyes — (c) and (d)nonono
Fraud time-limitedonly perjury/falsified evidenceyes, 182 daysyes, 6 monthsyes, 1 year
Catch-all wording"of an extraordinary nature""any other reason justifying relief""any other reason that justifies relief""any other reason that justifies relief"
Default judgments use the same ruleyes, via CR 55.02Rule 60(b)NRCP 60(b)Rule 60(b)
Motion suspends the judgmentno, expresslyno, expresslyno, expresslyno
Independent action barred if the motion would be untimelyyes, expressly

A short checklist

  1. Pick the lettered ground before drafting. The deadline depends on the letter, not on the story.
  2. If the problem is perjury or falsified evidence, that is (c) and it expires at one year. Other fraud affecting the proceedings is (d), and it does not.
  3. Count one year from entry for (a), (b) and (c).
  4. Move within a reasonable time whatever the ground. The cap is not a safe harbor.
  5. If the judgment is void, say so under (e) — that ground carries no fixed outer limit.
  6. For a default judgment, go through CR 55.02 to CR 60.02. "Good cause" alone is not the standard.
  7. Do not rely on (f) as a general fallback. It requires a reason of an extraordinary nature.
  8. Arrange a stay separately. The motion does not suspend the judgment's operation.
  9. Do not treat an independent action under CR 60.03 as a second chance. It is barred if the motion would have been out of time or the ground has already been denied.

Where these rules live

This page explains what the rules say. It isn't legal advice, and what qualifies as a reason of an extraordinary nature under CR 60.02(f) is developed in case law this site doesn't cover.

How this guide is sourced. Every procedural statement here is drawn from the text of the rules named above, each of which is reproduced verbatim on its own page on this site. Quoted rule language appears in quotation marks or block quotes; everything else is original writing. Last verified August 17, 2026.
This page explains what the rules say. It is legal information, not legal advice, and it cannot tell you how a rule applies to your situation. Deadlines are often short and some are not extendable — if the outcome matters, talk to a lawyer or your court’s self-help center.