§ 9-12-110.Short title
Chapter 12. Verdict and Judgment · Article 5. Uniform Foreign-Country Money Judgments Recognition Act · Last amended 2015 · Last verified July 17, 2026
Full Text of § 9-12-110
Plain-English Summary
A short-title section lets courts, lawyers, and researchers refer to an entire set of Code sections by one recognizable name instead of a string of section numbers. This one names the article that follows the Uniform Foreign-Country Money Judgments Recognition Act — a name that signals two things at once: the article deals specifically with judgments from foreign countries, and it is drawn from a uniform act meant to keep Georgia's approach consistent with other states that have adopted similar legislation.
That word "foreign-country" is doing precise work and should not be confused with a judgment from another U.S. state. Georgia has a separate article, later in this same chapter, for enforcing judgments from sister states within the United States. This article instead covers judgments rendered by courts of actual foreign nations — governments outside the reach of the Full Faith and Credit Clause that binds American states to one another.
The section itself sets up the name only; the substantive rules — what judgments qualify, the grounds for refusing recognition, and the effect recognition has — appear in the Code sections that follow within this same article.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the short title given to this article?
The "Uniform Foreign-Country Money Judgments Recognition Act."
What kind of judgments does this Act govern?
Money judgments rendered by courts of foreign countries — governments outside the United States and its states, districts, commonwealths, territories, and insular possessions.
Is the "Foreign-Country" in this Act's name the same thing as a judgment from another U.S. state?
No. A judgment from another U.S. state is a sister-state judgment, governed by a separate article of this chapter dealing with enforcement of foreign judgments in that domestic sense; this Act covers judgments from courts of actual foreign nations.
Why does Georgia use a "uniform" act for this subject?
Because many states have adopted similar legislation on recognizing foreign-country judgments, and drafting Georgia's version as a uniform act promotes consistency in how courts across different states approach the same recognition questions.
Where can a reader find the article's individual substantive provisions?
In the Code sections that follow this one within the same article, covering definitions, applicability, grounds for recognition and nonrecognition, and the effect of recognition.
Amendment History
Ga. L. 1975, p. 479, § 8; Ga. L. 2015, p. 996, § 2-1/SB 65.