Rule 29.Stipulations About Discovery Procedure
Last amended December 1, 2007 · Last verified June 30, 2026
Full Text of Rule 29
Amendment History
(Amended March 30, 1970, effective July 1, 1970; April 22, 1993, effective December 1, 1993; April 30, 2007, effective December 1, 2007.)
Plain-English Summary
Rule 29 gives litigants room to run discovery by agreement. Unless the court orders otherwise, the parties may stipulate that a deposition be taken before any authorized person, at any time or place, and on any notice, and that it be used like any other deposition.
They may also stipulate to modify other discovery procedures. The one limit: if a stipulation would extend the time to respond in a way that interferes with a deadline the court has set — for completing discovery, hearing a motion, or trial — it requires the court’s approval. Rule 29 reflects the rules’ general preference for letting parties manage routine discovery without burdening the court.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can the parties change discovery procedures by agreement?
Yes. Rule 29 lets them stipulate about depositions and modify other discovery procedures, except that a change affecting a court-set deadline needs the court’s approval.
Does a discovery stipulation need to be filed with the court?
Rule 29 does not require court approval for most stipulations — only one that would interfere with a deadline the court has already set, such as the close of discovery or the trial date.