Rule 21.Misjoinder and Nonjoinder of Parties
Last amended December 1, 2007 · Last verified June 30, 2026
Full Text of Rule 21
Amendment History
(Amended April 30, 2007, effective December 1, 2007.)
Plain-English Summary
Rule 21 is a short fix-it rule for party problems. If too many or the wrong parties have been joined (misjoinder), or a needed party is missing (nonjoinder), that is not a reason to throw out the whole case. The court instead reshapes the lineup.
On a party’s motion or on its own initiative, and at any stage of the case, the court may add a party, drop a party, or sever a claim and proceed with it separately — always on terms that are just. Rule 21 works alongside the joinder rules (Rules 19 and 20) to make sure a procedural misstep about who is in the case does not defeat the merits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a case be dismissed for adding the wrong party?
No. Under Rule 21, misjoinder is not a ground for dismissal; the court adds, drops, or severs parties or claims on just terms.
Who can ask the court to add, drop, or sever a party under Rule 21?
Any party may move for it, or the court may act on its own initiative, at any stage of the case, so long as the resulting order is on just terms.