Rule 88.Allowance of attorney’s fee
Part XI: General Provisions · Last amended January 1, 1991 · Last verified July 28, 2026
Full Text of Rule 88
Amendment History
Added, effective June 30, 1954; amended, effective Jan. 1, 1991.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 88 applies in two situations: where the court has appointed an attorney to represent a party, and where a party can't afford to pay for an attorney at all. In either case, before the court will make an allowance for the attorney's services, it requires the party, the attorney, or both, to make an affidavit or submit a letter — whichever the court directs — stating the amount that has been received, or will be received, for that purpose from any other source.
That disclosure requirement gives the court a full picture of what resources are already available for legal fees before it decides how much of an allowance, if any, to make.
Frequently Asked Questions
When does Rule 88 require a disclosure before an attorney gets paid?
Whenever the court has appointed an attorney to represent a party, or a party is without funds to pay an attorney, Rule 88 requires this disclosure before the court makes an allowance for the attorney's services.
What has to be disclosed?
The amount that has been received, or will be received, for the purpose of paying the attorney, from any source other than the party itself.
Who has to make the disclosure — the party or the attorney?
Rule 88 lets the court require the party, the attorney, or both, to make an affidavit or submit a letter, as the court directs.
Why does the court need this disclosure?
To know what funding for legal fees already exists from other sources before allowing an attorney's fee out of court-controlled or public resources.