Rule 82.Jurisdiction and venue unaffected
Part XI: General Provisions · Not amended since adoption on record · Last verified July 28, 2026
Full Text of Rule 82
Plain-English Summary
Rule 82 does one thing: it keeps the Rules of Civil Procedure in their lane. The rule states plainly that these Rules aren't to be construed to extend or limit the Superior Court's jurisdiction, or to affect the venue of actions brought there.
That matters because jurisdiction and venue come from statutes and other grants of authority, not from procedural rules about how a case moves once it's filed. Rule 82 makes sure a party can't argue that a procedural rule somehow opened the door to a claim the court otherwise couldn't hear, or moved a case somewhere the venue statutes wouldn't otherwise allow.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can the Rules of Civil Procedure give the Superior Court jurisdiction it wouldn't otherwise have?
No. Rule 82 states these Rules aren't to be construed to extend or limit the court's jurisdiction.
Does Rule 82 change where I can file my lawsuit?
No. Rule 82 states these Rules don't affect the venue of actions in the Superior Court.
Where do I look to find the Superior Court's actual jurisdiction, if not in these Rules?
Rule 82 points away from itself — jurisdiction and venue come from the statutes and other authority that establish them, not from the procedural rules.
Why does a rule about civil procedure need to say it doesn't affect jurisdiction or venue?
To prevent a procedural rule from being read as silently expanding what cases the court can hear or where they can be brought — Rule 82 forecloses that argument directly.