Rule 13.Counterclaim and cross-claim
Part III: Pleadings and Motions · Last amended January 1, 1991 · Last verified July 28, 2026
Full Text of Rule 13
Amendment History
Amended, effective Jan. 1, 1965; Jan. 1, 1967; Jan. 1, 1991.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 13(a) requires a pleading to state as a counterclaim any claim the pleader has against an opposing party at the time of serving the pleading, if that claim arises from the same transaction or occurrence as the opposing party's claim and doesn't require third parties the court can't get jurisdiction over. Two exceptions excuse a pleader from stating it: the claim was already the subject of another pending action when this one started, or the opposing party sued using attachment or similar process that didn't give the court personal jurisdiction, and the pleader isn't asserting any counterclaim at all. Rule 13(b) is broader -- a pleading may state as a permissive counterclaim any claim against an opposing party even if it has nothing to do with the transaction underlying the opposing party's claim.
Rule 13(c) confirms a counterclaim doesn't have to match or offset the opposing claim -- it can exceed the opposing claim in amount or seek relief of an entirely different kind. Rule 13(e) allows a claim that matured or was acquired after the pleader's own pleading was served to be presented as a counterclaim by supplemental pleading, with the court's permission. Rule 13(f) gives relief for an outright miss: when a pleader fails to set up a counterclaim through oversight, inadvertence, or excusable neglect, or when justice requires it, the pleader may set it up later by amendment with leave of court.
Rule 13(g) lets a pleading state a cross-claim against a coparty -- a claim arising from the same transaction or occurrence as the original action or a counterclaim in it, or relating to property that's the subject of the original action, including a claim that the cross-claim defendant is or may be liable for all or part of a claim asserted against the cross-claimant. Rule 13(h) allows additional parties to be joined to a counterclaim or cross-claim under Rules 19 and 20, and Rule 13(i) lets the court enter judgment on a counterclaim or cross-claim under Rule 54(b) even after separate trials, so long as the court has jurisdiction to do so, even if the opposing party's own claims have been dismissed.
Frequently Asked Questions
When do I have to file a counterclaim or lose it?
Rule 13(a) makes a counterclaim compulsory -- and requires it to be pleaded -- when it arises out of the same transaction or occurrence as the opposing party's claim and doesn't require third parties the court can't obtain jurisdiction over, unless one of the two narrow exceptions in the rule applies.
Can I bring a counterclaim that has nothing to do with the plaintiff's claim?
Yes. Rule 13(b) allows a permissive counterclaim against an opposing party even when it doesn't arise from the same transaction or occurrence as the opposing party's claim.
Can my counterclaim seek more money or different relief than the plaintiff is asking for?
Yes. Rule 13(c) states a counterclaim may exceed the opposing claim in amount or seek relief of a different kind, and it doesn't need to diminish or defeat the opposing party's recovery.
What if I forgot to raise a counterclaim I should have?
Rule 13(f) allows the court, by leave, to let a pleader set up an omitted counterclaim by amendment when the omission was the result of oversight, inadvertence, or excusable neglect, or when justice requires it.
What's a cross-claim, and against whom can I bring one?
Rule 13(g) allows a cross-claim against a coparty -- someone on the same side of the case -- for a claim arising from the same transaction or occurrence as the original action or a counterclaim in it, or relating to property that's the subject of the original action.