Rule 63.Inability of a judicial officer to proceed
Ch. VII: Judgment · Last amended 2020 · Current through June 1, 2026 · Last verified September 9, 2026
Full Text of Rule 63
Amendment History
Delaware prints each rule’s amendment history as a single “Credits” line naming every order that adopted or amended it. It is reproduced verbatim below.
[Amended effective September 3, 1996; September 1, 2020.]
Plain-English Summary
Where a trial or hearing has begun and the judicial officer is unable to proceed, any other judicial officer may proceed with it upon certifying familiarity with the record, and on the further terms the rule provides.
The certification is the safeguard. A successor does not simply inherit the case; they must state that they know what has happened in it. A hearing half-heard by someone who has not read the first half would be worse than starting again.
The rule matters more in this court than the single sentence suggests. Family matters return to court repeatedly over years, and hearings are frequently spread across separate days; a rule that let a case stall whenever a judicial officer became unavailable would cost the parties time they cannot get back.
Frequently Asked Questions
What happens if the judge cannot finish my Delaware Family Court hearing?
Any other judicial officer may proceed with it upon certifying familiarity with the record.
Does the hearing have to start over?
Not necessarily. The rule allows a successor judicial officer to continue, subject to the certification and the further terms the rule provides.