Rule 61.Harmless error
Ch. VII: Judgment · Current through June 1, 2026 · Last verified September 9, 2026
Full Text of Rule 61
Plain-English Summary
No error in admitting or excluding evidence, and no error or defect in any ruling, order, or anything done or omitted by the court or by any party, is ground for granting a new trial, for setting aside a verdict, or for vacating, modifying or otherwise disturbing a judgment or order, unless refusing to take that action appears inconsistent with substantial justice.
The court is to disregard any error or defect that does not affect the substantial rights of the parties.
The rule is a corrective against perfectionism. Trials contain mistakes, and a system that undid every judgment touched by one would never finish anything. What matters is whether the mistake could have changed the outcome — and the burden of that question sits with the party who wants the judgment disturbed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Will any mistake at trial get my Delaware Family Court judgment overturned?
No. An error is disregarded unless refusing to act on it would be inconsistent with substantial justice; the court disregards any error or defect that does not affect the substantial rights of the parties.
What counts as harmless error?
Any error or defect in a ruling, order, or in anything done or omitted, that does not affect the substantial rights of the parties.