RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 300.Expedited procedures for support actions

Ch. XV: Support Proceedings · Last amended 2023 · Current through June 1, 2026 · Last verified September 9, 2026

In one sentenceRule 300 routes support cases through expedited process — mediation and a hearing before a master or commissioner — unless the court finds one of the listed reasons to schedule a judge instead.

Full Text of Rule 300

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b) (c)

(a) Expedited Process; Definition.
(1) For any action in which a mediation conference is permitted under Rule 16.1(a), expedited process shall include the mediation conference together with a hearing before a master or commissioner if the mediation conference does not result in a permanent order for support.
(2) In all other proceedings requesting relief in the form of support pursuant to Chapter 5, and requesting relief pursuant to Chapters 4, 6 and 8 of Title 13 of the Delaware Code, including actions for modification of existing orders and proceedings alleging contempt of such orders, expedited process shall be the trial before a master or commissioner.
(b) Expedited Process; When Required. All actions for the determination, modification and enforcement of support obligations under Chapters 4, 5, 6 and 8 of Title 13 of the Delaware Code shall be scheduled and resolved by the use of expedited process as defined in Rule 300(a), unless the Court orders otherwise in accord with the criteria established under Rule 300(c).
(c) Initial Scheduling for Trial Before a Judge; When Allowed. Upon motion of either party or recommendation of the court staff mediator or upon its own motion, the Court may order trial of the action scheduled initially before a judge, provided there is a prior existing order in effect or, in the case of a petition for non-support, an interim or temporary order and the Court finds one of the following:
(1) the support matter is so intrinsically tied to an action that must be heard by a judge that the use of expedited process would unduly delay the proceedings; or
(2) the identity of the parties, issues and evidence are so similar in nature that consolidation with an already scheduled matter would in fact expedite the resolution of the support issue; or
(3) a material legal issue must be resolved for which there is no legal precedent; or
(4) such good and substantial cause as the Court may find, consistent with the principle that support cases shall be heard in a timely manner.
End

Amendment History

Delaware prints each rule’s amendment history as a single “Credits” line naming every order that adopted or amended it. It is reproduced verbatim below.

[Amended December 31, 1999, effective 30 days after notice to Bar; January 1, 2018; January 1, 2023.]

Plain-English Summary

What expedited process is. Where a mediation conference is permitted, expedited process means that conference plus a hearing before a master or commissioner if mediation does not produce a permanent support order. In every other support proceeding — including modifications of existing orders and contempt proceedings on them — expedited process means the trial before a master or commissioner.

When it applies. All actions for the determination, modification and enforcement of support obligations under the chapters of Title 13 the rule names are scheduled and resolved by expedited process, unless the court orders otherwise.

The reason is arithmetic. Support cases are the highest-volume work this court does, and most turn on figures rather than on contested law. A child waiting for support is not served by a place in the queue behind trials.

Going before a judge instead. On a party's motion, on the recommendation of the court staff mediator, or on its own motion, the court may schedule the trial before a judge — but only where there is a prior existing order in effect, or an interim or temporary order in a non-support petition, and the court finds one of the following.

That the support matter is so intrinsically tied to an action that must be heard by a judge that expedited process would unduly delay things. That the parties, issues and evidence are so similar to an already scheduled matter that consolidating would actually be faster. That a material legal issue must be resolved for which there is no legal precedent. Or such other good and substantial cause as the court finds, consistent with the principle that support cases are to be heard in a timely manner.

Every one of those is about speed, including the last, which repeats the principle aloud in case the exceptions start swallowing the rule.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who hears child support cases in the Delaware Family Court?

A master or commissioner, through expedited process — a mediation conference followed by a hearing where mediation is permitted, and otherwise the trial before the master or commissioner — unless the court orders otherwise.

Can a support case be heard by a judge instead?

Yes, on motion of either party, the recommendation of the court staff mediator or the court's own motion, provided a prior order or an interim or temporary order is in effect and the court makes one of the findings the rule lists.

Does expedited process apply to modification and contempt?

Yes. It covers actions for the determination, modification and enforcement of support obligations, including modification of existing orders and proceedings alleging contempt of them.

Source & verification. The rule text and amendment history are reproduced verbatim from the Delaware Family Court Rules of Civil Procedure (Fam. Ct. Civ. R. 300), and every rule has been checked word for word against the Delaware Family Court’s own published edition of these rules. Current through June 1, 2026. The plain-English summary is original and written by us. Last verified September 9, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: expedited process support Delawarechild support master commissioner DelawareFam. Ct. Civ. R. 300