§ 9.Limitations shall continue to run
Preliminary Provisions · Last amended 2018 · Last verified July 28, 2026
Full Text of § 9
Plain-English Summary
Section 9 solves a timing problem the 1872 codification could otherwise have created. If a statute of limitations — or any other deadline meant to bar a claim or protect a right — had already started running before the code took effect, and the code sets its own version of that same limitation, the clock doesn’t restart. The time that already passed still counts.
The rule exists because the code gathers the state’s statutes of limitations into one place; without it, recodifying those deadlines could have accidentally given litigants extra time they were never meant to have.
Official Comment
The following official comments are published by the California Law Revision Commission (and, for a few older sections, its predecessor Code Commissioners) alongside the statute itself — not commentary from this site.
Code Commissioners' Note. Necessary, because the statutes of limitations for civil actions and proceedings are embodied in this code.
Frequently Asked Questions
If a statute of limitations was already running when the Code of Civil Procedure took effect, did it start over?
No. Section 9 counts the time that already ran toward the limitation period the code now prescribes.
Why was this rule necessary?
Because the code consolidated the state’s statutes of limitations into one place, and without a continuity rule, that consolidation could have reset deadlines already in progress.
Amendment History
Enacted 1872. Amended Code Amdts 1873–74 ch 383 § 1; Stats 2017 ch 561 § 20 (AB 1516), effective January 1, 2018.