§ 764.080.Action Brought to Quiet Title to Land Subject to Agreement Pursuant to Sections 6307 Or 6357, Public Resources Code
Title 10. Actions In Particular Cases · Chapter 4. Quiet Title · Article 5. Judgment · Enacted 1989 · no amendments on record · Last verified July 28, 2026
In one sentenceSection 764.080 requires the court in a quiet title action involving land subject to a Public Resources Code § 6307 or § 6357 boundary agreement to take evidence on the agreement, issue a statement of decision on whether it meets the applicable legal requirements, quiet title accordingly if valid, and set the case for trial within one year absent good cause.
(a)In any action brought to quiet title to land that has been subject to an agreement entered into pursuant to Section 6307 or 6357 of the Public Resources Code, at the time set for trial the court shall, at the request of any party, receive evidence on the nature of the agreement. After receiving that evidence, the court shall render a statement of decision. In the case of an agreement pursuant to Section 6357, the statement of decision shall include a recitation of the underlying facts and a determination whether the agreement meets the criteria of Section 6357 and other law applicable to the validity of boundary line agreements. In the case of an agreement pursuant to Section 6307, the statement of decision shall recite the relevant facts and shall contain a determination whether the requirements of Section 6307 of the Public Resources Code, Sections 3 and 4 of Article 10 of the California Constitution, and other applicable law have been met. If the court finds the agreement to be valid, the judgment in the action shall quiet title in the parties named in the agreement in accordance with the agreement. If the judgment is entered prior to the effective date of the agreement, the judgment shall provide that, upon the effective date, title is quieted in the parties in accordance with the agreements. However, no action may be brought pursuant to this section until the State Lands Commission has approved the agreement following a public hearing. All such actions shall be set on the trial calendar within one year from the filing of a memorandum to set, unless the court extends this time for good cause.
(b)Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the right of members of the public to bring or participate in actions challenging the validity of agreements entered into pursuant to Section 6307 or 6357 of the Public Resources Code. Any action brought by a member of the public shall be set on the trial calendar within one year from the filing of a memorandum to set, unless the court extends this time for good cause.
Plain-English Summary
This section governs a specialized situation: land that's the subject of a boundary agreement between a private landowner and the State Lands Commission, entered under Public Resources Code § 6307 or § 6357, and now caught up in a quiet title action. At any party's request at trial, the court has to receive evidence on the nature of the agreement, then issue a statement of decision.
What the statement of decision must cover depends on which statute the agreement was made under. For a § 6357 boundary-line agreement, the court must recite the underlying facts and determine whether the agreement satisfies § 6357 and other law governing boundary line agreements. For a § 6307 agreement, the court must recite the relevant facts and determine whether the agreement satisfies § 6307, the relevant provisions of Article 10 of the California Constitution, and other applicable law.
If the court finds the agreement valid, the judgment quiets title in the parties named in the agreement, consistent with its terms — and if judgment comes down before the agreement's effective date, the judgment provides that title vests in those parties once the agreement takes effect. No action under this section may be brought until the State Lands Commission has approved the agreement at a public hearing, and both this kind of action and any public challenge under subdivision (b) must be set for trial within one year of filing a memorandum to set, unless the court extends the time for good cause.
Frequently Asked Questions
What must the court do in a quiet title case involving a state boundary-line agreement?
At any party's request, the court must receive evidence on the nature of the agreement and issue a statement of decision addressing whether it satisfies the requirements of Public Resources Code § 6307 or § 6357, as applicable, and other governing law.
What happens if the court finds the boundary agreement valid?
The judgment quiets title in the parties named in the agreement, consistent with its terms; if judgment is entered before the agreement's effective date, title vests once the agreement takes effect.
Can these actions be brought before the State Lands Commission approves the agreement?
No. Section 764.080(a) bars an action under this section until the Commission has approved the agreement following a public hearing.
Is there a deadline for bringing these cases to trial?
Yes. Both actions under this section and public challenges under subdivision (b) must be set for trial within one year of filing a memorandum to set, unless the court extends the time for good cause.
Amendment History
Added by Stats. 1989, Ch. 1045, Sec. 2.
Source & verification. Section text is reproduced verbatim from
the Deering's California Codes Annotated / vLex. Enacted by the California Legislature.
Last verified July 28, 2026.
· Official source
Also known as:state lands commission boundary agreement quiet titlepublic resources code 6307 quiet title action