§ 73d.Hearing in another county; Expenses
Title 1. Organization and Jurisdiction · Chapter 4. Superior Courts · Last amended 2003 · Last verified July 28, 2026
Full Text of § 73d
Plain-English Summary
§ 73d follows directly from § 73c. If a hearing on a failed savings and loan association’s property has to happen away from the home county, the court personnel who travel there should not bear that cost themselves.
The judge, clerk, deputy clerk, court reporter, or bailiff who travels is allowed the necessary expenses of going, returning, and attending to the court’s business, and the court orders that reimbursement paid out of the association’s own funds by the Commissioner of Financial Institutions.
Official Comment
The following official comments are published by the California Law Revision Commission (and, for a few older sections, its predecessor Code Commissioners) alongside the statute itself — not commentary from this site.
2003 Law Revision Commission Comment. Section 73d is amended to replace references to the former “Building and Loan Commissioner” with references to the “Commissioner of Financial Institutions.” See 1955 Cal. Stat. ch. 40, § 1; Fin. Code § 210.5(c). The section is also amended to replace the reference to “building and loan association” with a reference to “savings and loan association.” See 1955 Cal. Stat. ch. 40, § 1.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who pays when court staff must travel to another county for a § 73c hearing?
The association whose property is at issue — its funds cover the expenses, paid out by the Commissioner of Financial Institutions on the court’s order.
Does § 73d cover expenses for any court hearing that requires travel?
No — it applies only to travel connected with a § 73c hearing on the sale or other disposition of a savings and loan association’s property.
Amendment History
Added Stats 1945 ch 3 § 2, effective January 22, 1945. Amended Stats 2003 ch 149 § 2 (SB 79).