§ 577.Definition
Title 8. Of the Trial and Judgment In Civil Actions · Chapter 1. Judgment in General · Enacted 1872 · no amendments on record · Last verified July 28, 2026
Full Text of § 577
Plain-English Summary
Every procedural rule about judgments has to start somewhere, and this is where California's starts. A judgment is the court's final word on the rights of the parties — not a passing ruling on a motion, not a comment from the bench, but the determination that closes out the dispute (or a defined piece of it) between the parties before the court.
That word "final" carries weight. It's what separates a judgment from the interlocutory orders that come and go during a case — rulings on discovery disputes, in limine motions, or continuances. Those orders manage the litigation; a judgment ends it, which is why judgments (unlike most orders) are generally what a losing party appeals.
The sections that follow in this chapter fill in the details: how relief is capped by what the complaint demands (§ 580), how judgment can run for or against some but not all parties (§ 578, § 579), and how an action can end instead through dismissal (§ 581) or a judgment resting on the merits (§ 582). All of them assume the baseline definition this section supplies.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does California law mean by a "judgment"?
Section 577 defines it as the final determination of the rights of the parties in an action or proceeding — the decision that resolves the case, or a defined part of it, rather than a routine ruling along the way.
Is every court order a judgment?
No. Most rulings issued during a case — on motions, continuances, or discovery — are not final determinations of the parties' rights and so are not judgments in this sense.
Why does the definition of a judgment matter procedurally?
Because so many other rules, including the right to appeal and the deadlines in this title, turn on whether a ruling counts as a judgment rather than an interim order.
Amendment History
Enacted 1872.