§ 569.Deposit of Funds In Interest Bearing Accounts
Title 7. Other Provisional Remedies In Civil Actions · Chapter 5. Receivers · Last amended 1999 · Last verified July 28, 2026
Full Text of § 569
Plain-English Summary
Holding cash idle helps no one, so § 569 lets a receiver put estate funds to work in interest-bearing accounts rather than leaving them uninvested. The account has to be in the name of, and for the benefit of, the receivership estate -- not the receiver personally.
Three conditions keep the arrangement honest. The deposits must be fully guaranteed or insured under federal law, so the estate doesn't take on bank-failure risk. The financial institution can't be a party to the underlying action, avoiding an obvious conflict. And the receiver can't have a financial or family stake in that institution -- no ownership of 1 percent or more of its outstanding stock, no job as an officer, director, or employee, and no close relationship by blood or marriage to anyone who does hold those positions.
Read together, these conditions make sure the receiver's choice of bank serves the estate's interest in earning a return, not the receiver's own interest in steering business to a friendly institution.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a receiver earn interest on estate funds?
Yes, § 569 lets a receiver deposit receivership funds in one or more interest-bearing accounts.
What insurance requirement applies to these deposits?
The deposits must be fully guaranteed or insured under federal law.
Can a receiver deposit funds with a bank that is a party to the lawsuit?
No, § 569(b) bars using a financial institution that is a party to the action in which the receiver was appointed.
Can a receiver use a bank in which the receiver owns stock?
Not if the receiver owns 1 percent or more in value of the institution's outstanding stock, or is an officer, director, or employee, or a close relative of one who is.
Amendment History
Amended by Stats. 1998, Ch. 932, Sec. 16. Effective January 1, 1999.