RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 2094.Oath, affirmation, or declaration; form

Title 6. Of Evidence in Particular Cases, and Miscellaneous and General Provisions · Chapter 3. Administration of Oaths and Affirmations · Last amended 2002 · Last verified July 29, 2026

In one sentenceSection 2094 authorizes an oath, affirmation, or declaration by securing an affirmative answer to one of two prescribed questions, a traditional oath or a penalty-of-perjury declaration, or in any manner calculated to impress the duty to tell the truth, so long as the court confirms the person understands the testimony is given under penalty of perjury.

Full Text of § 2094

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b)

(a) An oath, affirmation, or declaration in an action or a proceeding, may be administered by obtaining an affirmative response to one of the following questions:
(1) “Do you solemnly state that the evidence you shall give in this issue (or matter) shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God?”
(2) “Do you solemnly state, under penalty of perjury, that the evidence that you shall give in this issue (or matter) shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?”
(b) In the alternative to the forms prescribed in subdivision (a), the court may administer an oath, affirmation, or declaration in an action or a proceeding in a manner that is calculated to awaken the person's conscience and impress the person's mind with the duty to tell the truth. The court shall satisfy itself that the person testifying understands that his or her testimony is being given under penalty of perjury.

Plain-English Summary

This section supplies the actual words used to place a witness under oath. Subdivision (a) offers two scripted questions, and administering the oath is as simple as getting an affirmative answer to one of them. The first invokes a traditional religious oath, asking the witness to solemnly state that the testimony will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help the witness God. The second drops the religious framing and asks the witness to make the same solemn statement under penalty of perjury instead, giving a witness who is uncomfortable swearing to a deity a secular option that carries the identical legal weight.

Subdivision (b) adds flexibility beyond those two scripts. A court may administer an oath, affirmation, or declaration in any manner calculated to awaken the person’s conscience and impress upon the person the duty to tell the truth, which allows for forms suited to a particular witness’s beliefs or circumstances rather than forcing every witness into one of the two set questions. That flexibility comes with a safeguard: whatever form is used, the court has to satisfy itself that the person testifying understands that the testimony is being given under penalty of perjury, since that exposure to perjury liability is what gives any version of the oath its legal force.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the two standard oath questions under subdivision (a)?

One asks the witness to solemnly state, so help the witness God, that the testimony will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth; the other asks for the same solemn statement under penalty of perjury, without the religious language.

Does a witness have to swear to God to testify in California?

No. The second scripted question in subdivision (a) lets a witness affirm under penalty of perjury without any religious reference.

Can a court use a form of oath other than the two listed questions?

Yes. Subdivision (b) lets the court administer an oath, affirmation, or declaration in any manner calculated to impress the witness with the duty to tell the truth.

What must the court confirm before using an alternative oath format?

That the person testifying understands the testimony is being given under penalty of perjury.

Amendment History

(Enacted in 1872. Amended Code Am.1873-74, c. 383, p. 394, § 250; Amended by Stats.2000, c. 688 (A.B.1669), § 13; Stats.2002, c. 806 (A.B.3027), § 17.)

Source & verification. Section text is reproduced verbatim from the West's Annotated California Codes / Thomson Reuters. Enacted by the California Legislature. Last verified July 29, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: ccp 2094 oath or affirmation form californiaswearing in a witness without religious oathaffirmation under penalty of perjury instead of oath