§ 2094.Oath, affirmation, or declaration; form
Title 6. Of Evidence in Particular Cases, and Miscellaneous and General Provisions · Chapter 3. Administration of Oaths and Affirmations · Last amended 2002 · Last verified July 29, 2026
Full Text of § 2094
Plain-English Summary
This section supplies the actual words used to place a witness under oath. Subdivision (a) offers two scripted questions, and administering the oath is as simple as getting an affirmative answer to one of them. The first invokes a traditional religious oath, asking the witness to solemnly state that the testimony will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help the witness God. The second drops the religious framing and asks the witness to make the same solemn statement under penalty of perjury instead, giving a witness who is uncomfortable swearing to a deity a secular option that carries the identical legal weight.
Subdivision (b) adds flexibility beyond those two scripts. A court may administer an oath, affirmation, or declaration in any manner calculated to awaken the person’s conscience and impress upon the person the duty to tell the truth, which allows for forms suited to a particular witness’s beliefs or circumstances rather than forcing every witness into one of the two set questions. That flexibility comes with a safeguard: whatever form is used, the court has to satisfy itself that the person testifying understands that the testimony is being given under penalty of perjury, since that exposure to perjury liability is what gives any version of the oath its legal force.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the two standard oath questions under subdivision (a)?
One asks the witness to solemnly state, so help the witness God, that the testimony will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth; the other asks for the same solemn statement under penalty of perjury, without the religious language.
Does a witness have to swear to God to testify in California?
No. The second scripted question in subdivision (a) lets a witness affirm under penalty of perjury without any religious reference.
Can a court use a form of oath other than the two listed questions?
Yes. Subdivision (b) lets the court administer an oath, affirmation, or declaration in any manner calculated to impress the witness with the duty to tell the truth.
What must the court confirm before using an alternative oath format?
That the person testifying understands the testimony is being given under penalty of perjury.
Amendment History
(Enacted in 1872. Amended Code Am.1873-74, c. 383, p. 394, § 250; Amended by Stats.2000, c. 688 (A.B.1669), § 13; Stats.2002, c. 806 (A.B.3027), § 17.)