RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 2035.050.Order authorizing discovery; considerations;

Title 4. Civil Discovery Act · Chapter 19. Perpetuation of Testimony or Preservation of Evidence Before Filing Action · Last amended 2005 · Last verified July 29, 2026

In one sentenceSection 2035.050 authorizes the court to grant a Chapter 19 discovery petition when it would prevent a failure or delay of justice, requires the resulting order to identify the specific witnesses, materials, and examinations covered, and directs that the authorized discovery proceed under the ordinary rules for that method.

Full Text of § 2035.050

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b) (c)

(a) If the court determines that all or part of the discovery requested under this chapter may prevent a failure or delay of justice, it shall make an order authorizing that discovery. In determining whether to authorize discovery by a petitioner who expects a successor in interest to be a party to an action, the court shall consider, in addition to other appropriate factors, whether the requested discovery could be conducted by the petitioner's successor in interest, instead of by the petitioner.
(b) The order shall identify any witness whose deposition may be taken, and any documents, things, or places that may be inspected, and any person whose physical or mental condition may be examined.
(c) Any authorized depositions, inspections, and physical or mental examinations shall then be conducted in accordance with the provisions of this title relating to those methods of discovery in actions that have been filed.

Plain-English Summary

This is the section that gets a pre-filing discovery petition across the finish line. If the court determines that authorizing all or part of the requested discovery would prevent a failure or delay of justice, it must issue an order allowing it. Where the petitioner is acting on behalf of an expected successor in interest, rather than expecting to be a party outright, the court also weighs a factor unique to that situation: whether the successor in interest could conduct the same discovery once it steps into the petitioner's shoes, which might counsel against authorizing pre-filing discovery for someone who is not yet, and may never be, the actual party.

The order itself cannot be open-ended. It has to name the specific witnesses whose depositions are authorized, describe the documents, things, or places that may be inspected, and identify anyone whose physical or mental condition may be examined, tracking the petition's own specificity requirements. And once that order issues, the discovery does not happen in some special pre-filing procedural vacuum. Depositions, inspections, and examinations authorized under this chapter follow the same rules that govern those methods in a case that has already been filed, so the petitioner and the expected adverse parties operate under familiar, well-tested procedures rather than a separate set of pre-filing rules.

Frequently Asked Questions

What standard must the court apply to grant a Chapter 19 petition?

Whether authorizing all or part of the requested discovery may prevent a failure or delay of justice.

What extra factor does the court weigh when the petitioner expects a successor in interest to be the actual party?

Whether the requested discovery could instead be conducted by that successor in interest once it becomes a party, rather than by the petitioner now.

What must the resulting discovery order specify?

The witnesses whose depositions may be taken, the documents, things, or places that may be inspected, and any person whose physical or mental condition may be examined.

Do special procedures apply once the pre-filing discovery is authorized?

No. The authorized depositions, inspections, and examinations proceed under the same rules that govern those methods in an already-filed action.

Amendment History

(Added by Stats.2004, c. 182 (A.B.3081), § 23, operative July 1, 2005. Amended by Stats.2005, c. 294 (A.B.333), § 15.)

Source & verification. Section text is reproduced verbatim from the West's Annotated California Codes / Thomson Reuters. Enacted by the California Legislature. Last verified July 29, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: ccp 2035.050 order authorizing pre-filing discoveryprevent failure or delay of justice petitioncourt order perpetuate testimony before lawsuit