RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 2033.030.Number of admission requests; limitations;

Title 4. Civil Discovery Act · Chapter 16. Requests for Admission · Article 1. Requests for Admission · Enacted 2004 · no amendments on record · Last verified July 29, 2026

In one sentenceSection 2033.030 caps requests for admission that do not concern document genuineness at 35 per party as a matter of right, leaves requests about document genuineness unlimited except as a protective order may restrict them, and lets an unserved-declaration responding party answer only the first 35 and object that the cap has been exceeded.

Full Text of § 2033.030

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b) (c)

(a) No party shall request, as a matter of right, that any other party admit more than 35 matters that do not relate to the genuineness of documents. If the initial set of admission requests does not exhaust this limit, the balance may be requested in subsequent sets.
(b) Unless a declaration as described in Section 2033.050 has been made, a party need only respond to the first 35 admission requests served that do not relate to the genuineness of documents, if that party states an objection to the balance under Section 2033.230 on the ground that the limit has been exceeded.
(c) The number of requests for admission of the genuineness of documents is not limited except as justice requires to protect the responding party from unwarranted annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden and expense.

Plain-English Summary

This section fixes the numeric ceiling that shapes how requests for admission are drafted in ordinary practice. Absent a supporting declaration, a party may request no more than 35 admissions that do not concern the genuineness of a document, as a matter of right. If an initial set uses fewer than all 35, the unused balance carries forward and can be requested in a later set, so nothing is lost by not front-loading every request into a single service.

Requests asking a party to admit that a document is genuine sit outside this cap entirely. Their number is not limited by count at all, only by the general protective-order standard: a court can still cut back an oversized or abusive set of document-genuineness requests to guard the responding party from unwarranted annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden and expense. And the 35-request cap on other matters is self-enforcing on the response side. If a propounding party serves more than 35 non-genuineness requests without attaching the declaration Section 2033.050 requires, the responding party need only answer the first 35 and may object to the rest on the specific ground that the limit has been exceeded.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many requests for admission (other than document genuineness) can a party serve without a declaration?

No more than 35 as a matter of right, unless the propounding party attaches the declaration described in Section 2033.050.

Is there a numeric cap on requests asking a party to admit a document is genuine?

No. Those requests are not limited by number, though a court can still restrict them through a protective order to prevent unwarranted burden or abuse.

Can a party split its 35 requests across multiple sets?

Yes. If an initial set does not use the full 35, the unused balance can be requested in later sets.

What can a responding party do if it receives more than 35 non-genuineness requests without the required declaration?

It need only respond to the first 35 served and may object to the remainder on the ground that the limit has been exceeded.

Amendment History

(Added by Stats.2004, c. 182 (A.B.3081), § 23, operative July 1, 2005.)

Source & verification. Section text is reproduced verbatim from the West's Annotated California Codes / Thomson Reuters. Enacted by the California Legislature. Last verified July 29, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: ccp 2033.030 35 request for admission limitdocument genuineness requests unlimited californiaexceeding request for admission cap