§ 2030.030.Specially prepared and official form interrogatories; limit on number of specially
Title 4. Civil Discovery Act · Chapter 13. Written Interrogatories · Article 1. Propounding Interrogatories · Enacted 2004 · no amendments on record · Last verified July 29, 2026
Full Text of § 2030.030
Plain-English Summary
This is the section every California litigator has memorized: absent a supporting declaration, a party may propound no more than 35 specially prepared interrogatories, questions drafted for the particular case, to any other party as a matter of right. That cap runs separately from official form interrogatories, the standardized Judicial Council forms covering routine subjects, which carry no numeric limit at all. A party can combine both freely: 35 case-specific questions plus as many relevant form interrogatories as the case calls for.
The 35-question limit is not exhausted all at once. If an initial set of specially prepared interrogatories uses fewer than 35, the unused balance can be propounded in later sets, so a party is not forced to front-load every question into a single service. And the cap is self-enforcing on the response side: if a propounding party serves more than 35 specially prepared interrogatories without attaching the declaration Section 2030.050 requires, the responding party need only answer the first 35 and may object to the rest on the specific ground that the limit under this section has been exceeded, an objection Section 2030.240 requires be stated clearly.
Frequently Asked Questions
How many specially prepared interrogatories can a party serve without a declaration?
No more than 35 as a matter of right, unless the propounding party attaches the declaration for additional discovery described in Section 2030.050.
Does the 35-question limit apply to official form interrogatories?
No. Official form interrogatories under Chapter 17 are not counted against the 35-question cap on specially prepared interrogatories.
Can a party split its 35 specially prepared interrogatories across multiple sets?
Yes. If the initial set does not use the full 35, the remaining balance may be propounded in subsequent sets.
What can a responding party do if it receives more than 35 specially prepared interrogatories without the required declaration?
It need only answer the first 35 served and may object to the remainder on the ground that the limit has been exceeded.
How can a party exceed the 35-interrogatory limit?
Amendment History
(Added by Stats.2004, c. 182 (A.B.3081), § 23, operative July 1, 2005.)