RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 2030.090.Motion for protective order; types of protective orders;

Title 4. Civil Discovery Act · Chapter 13. Written Interrogatories · Article 1. Propounding Interrogatories · Enacted 2004 · no amendments on record · Last verified July 29, 2026

In one sentenceSection 2030.090 lets a responding party or affected person move for a protective order against propounded interrogatories after a required meet-and-confer, authorizes relief such as excusing answers, extending time, limiting the number of interrogatories, or shifting to deposition discovery, and mandates a sanction against whichever side loses the motion absent substantial justification.

Full Text of § 2030.090

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b) (c) (d)

(a) When interrogatories have been propounded, the responding party, and any other party or affected natural person or organization may promptly move for a protective order. This motion shall be accompanied by a meet and confer declaration under Section 2016.040.
(b) The court, for good cause shown, may make any order that justice requires to protect any party or other natural person or organization from unwarranted annoyance, embarrassment, or oppression, or undue burden and expense. This protective order may include, but is not limited to, one or more of the following directions:
(1) That the set of interrogatories, or particular interrogatories in the set, need not be answered.
(2) That, contrary to the representations made in a declaration submitted under Section 2030.050, the number of specially prepared interrogatories is unwarranted.
(3) That the time specified in Section 2030.260 to respond to the set of interrogatories, or to particular interrogatories in the set, be extended.
(4) That the response be made only on specified terms and conditions.
(5) That the method of discovery be an oral deposition instead of interrogatories to a party.
(6) That a trade secret or other confidential research, development, or commercial information not be disclosed or be disclosed only in a certain way.
(7) That some or all of the answers to interrogatories be sealed and thereafter opened only on order of the court.
WESTLAW © 2026 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 1 § 2030.090. Motion for protective order; types of protective orders; court order and conditions for..., CA CIV PRO § 2030.090
(c) If the motion for a protective order is denied in whole or in part, the court may order that the party provide or permit the discovery against which protection was sought on terms and conditions that are just.
(d) The court shall impose a monetary sanction under Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 2023.010) against any party, person, or attorney who unsuccessfully makes or opposes a motion for a protective order under this section, unless it finds that the one subject to the sanction acted with substantial justification or that other circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust.

Plain-English Summary

Once interrogatories have gone out, the responding party, or another party or affected natural person or organization, is not stuck answering everything as written. This section gives that party a protective-order motion, but only after first attempting to work things out informally, the motion must be accompanied by a meet-and-confer declaration confirming a genuine attempt at resolution before running to court.

If good cause is shown, the range of relief a court can order is broad and expressly non-exclusive. It can excuse an entire set, or particular interrogatories, from needing an answer at all; it can find that the number of specially prepared interrogatories claimed to be justified under Section 2030.040 is not warranted after all; it can extend the response deadline set by Section 2030.260; it can impose specified terms and conditions on the response; it can direct that a deposition replace interrogatories as the discovery method for a given subject; or it can seal some or all of the answers pending further court order, useful where trade secrets or other confidential business information are involved. If the court denies the motion in whole or in part, it can still condition the discovery that goes forward on terms that are just to the responding party. And whichever side loses the motion faces a mandatory monetary sanction under Chapter 7, unless the court finds substantial justification for that side's position or finds the sanction would otherwise be unjust, a rule that discourages both abusive interrogatories and meritless protective-order motions alike.

Frequently Asked Questions

What must accompany a motion for a protective order against interrogatories?

A meet-and-confer declaration under Section 2016.040, showing the moving party attempted to resolve the dispute informally before filing.

What kinds of relief can a court order on a protective order motion?

Among other things, that some or all interrogatories need not be answered, that the number of specially prepared interrogatories was unwarranted, that the response deadline be extended, that the response be made on specified terms, that a deposition replace interrogatories, or that answers be sealed pending further order.

What happens if the court denies the protective order motion?

It may order that discovery proceed on terms and conditions that are just to the party who sought protection.

Is a party or attorney automatically sanctioned for losing a protective order motion under this section?

Generally yes. The court must impose a monetary sanction under Chapter 7 against whoever unsuccessfully makes or opposes the motion, unless that person acted with substantial justification or the sanction would otherwise be unjust.

Who can bring a motion for a protective order under this section?

The responding party, and also any other party or affected natural person or organization whose interests the interrogatories implicate.

Amendment History

(Added by Stats.2004, c. 182 (A.B.3081), § 23, operative July 1, 2005.)

Source & verification. Section text is reproduced verbatim from the West's Annotated California Codes / Thomson Reuters. Enacted by the California Legislature. Last verified July 29, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: ccp 2030.090 protective order interrogatoriesmotion to limit number of interrogatories californiameet and confer before protective order motion