§ 2019.210.Misappropriation of trade secrets
Title 4. Civil Discovery Act · Chapter 5. Methods and Sequence of Discovery · Article 2. Methods and Sequence of Discovery in Specific Contexts · Enacted 2004 · no amendments on record · Last verified July 29, 2026
Full Text of § 2019.210
Plain-English Summary
Trade secret cases create an obvious risk: a party could use discovery itself as a fishing expedition to find out what the secret supposedly is, or to probe a competitor's confidential information under cover of litigation. This section heads that off. Before a party alleging misappropriation under the Uniform Trade Secrets Act can start discovery relating to the trade secret, that party first has to identify the trade secret with reasonable particularity.
The requirement isn't a one-time formality that disappears once filed; it's paired with the court's authority to enter protective orders under Civil Code Section 3426.5, so the identification and any resulting discovery both proceed under whatever confidentiality safeguards the case calls for. Pinning down the trade secret first gives the defense a fixed target to respond to and keeps discovery focused on what was alleged to have been misappropriated, rather than a moving description that expands as the case unfolds.
Frequently Asked Questions
What must a party do before taking discovery in a trade secret misappropriation case?
Identify the trade secret with reasonable particularity, before commencing discovery relating to that trade secret.
Does this identification requirement come with any confidentiality protection?
Yes. It's subject to any protective orders the court considers appropriate under Civil Code Section 3426.5.
Does Section 2019.210 apply to every kind of trade secret dispute?
It applies specifically to actions alleging misappropriation under the Uniform Trade Secrets Act, Civil Code Section 3426 and following.
Amendment History
(Added by Stats.2004, c. 182 (A.B.3081), § 23, operative July 1, 2005.)