§ 1732.Definitions
Title 11. Money Judgments of Other Jurisdictions · Chapter 3. Tribal Court Civil Money Judgment Act · Last amended 2018 · Last verified July 29, 2026
Full Text of § 1732
Plain-English Summary
Every later section in this chapter leans on the vocabulary Section 1732 sets up. An “applicant” is whoever can bring an action to enforce a tribal court money judgment, and a “respondent” is whoever that action can be brought against. “Civil action or proceeding” covers anything that isn't criminal, apart from the categories Section 1731 already carves out. “Good cause” ties to a substantial reason grounded in the prejudice or irreparable harm a party would suffer without a hearing, or without one held on schedule, which matters later when a court decides whether to hold a hearing outside the usual timeline.
The definition of “due process” spells out concrete features, the right to counsel, reasonable notice, a hearing opportunity, cross-examination, and a chance to present evidence to an impartial decisionmaker, rather than leaving that phrase to abstract debate. “Tribal court” reaches any court or tribunal of a federally recognized tribe, pueblo, band, or Alaska Native village, including Courts of Indian Offenses. And “tribal court money judgment” is defined narrowly: a written, final, conclusive judgment for a specified sum, enforceable in the tribal court that issued it and authenticated under that tribe's own procedures, which is what keeps this chapter from reaching informal or non-final tribal rulings.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the “applicant” under this chapter?
The person or persons who can bring an action to enforce a tribal court money judgment.
What features does “due process” include under this section's definition?
The right to counsel, reasonable notice and a hearing opportunity, the ability to call and cross-examine witnesses, and the chance to present evidence to an impartial decisionmaker.
What makes a ruling a “tribal court money judgment” under this chapter?
It must be a written judgment for a specified amount of money, issued in a civil action, that is final, conclusive, and enforceable in the tribal court that issued it, and authenticated under that tribe's own laws and procedures.
Why does the chapter define “good cause” separately?
Because later sections let a court act outside the chapter's normal deadlines for good cause, and this definition ties that phrase to the concrete prejudice or irreparable harm a party would suffer otherwise.
Amendment History
Amended by Stats 2017 ch 168 (AB 905),s 12, eff. 1/1/2018. Added by Stats 2014 ch 243 (SB 406),s 4, eff. 1/1/2015.