RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 155.Jurisdiction of superior court to make judicial determinations regarding custody and care of children within federal Immigration and Nationality Act; Order of special immigrant juvenile status

Title 1. Organization and Jurisdiction · Chapter 7. Special Immigrant Juvenile Findings · Last amended 2025 · Last verified July 28, 2026

In one sentenceSection 155 lets California superior courts make the findings a child needs to petition for federal special immigrant juvenile status: whether the child was declared a dependent or placed in custody, whether reunifying with a parent is viable, and whether returning to their home country serves the child’s best interest.

Full Text of § 155

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e)

(1) A superior court has jurisdiction under California law to make judicial determinations regarding the dependency or custody, or both, and care of children within the meaning of the federal Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. Sec. 1101 et seq. and 8 C.F.R. Sec. 204.11), which includes, but is not limited to, the juvenile, probate, and family court divisions of the superior court. These courts have jurisdiction to make the judicial determinations necessary to enable a child to petition the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services for classification as a special immigrant juvenile pursuant to Section 1101(a)(27)(J) of Title 8 of the United States Code.
(2) The judicial determinations set forth in paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) may be made for a child up to 21 years of age at any point in a proceeding regardless of the division of the superior court or type of proceeding if the prerequisites of that subdivision are met. A nunc pro tunc entry is permissible and shall not require proof of any clerical or other error, as long as the determinations could have been made as of the nunc pro tunc date.
(1) If an order is requested from the superior court making the necessary determinations regarding special immigrant juvenile status pursuant to Section 1101(a)(27)(J) of Title 8 of the United States Code, and there is evidence to support those determinations, which may consist solely of, but is not limited to, a declaration by the child who is the subject of the petition, the court shall issue the order, which shall include all of the following determinations, each of which shall be supported by reference to the relevant provisions of California law:
(A) The child was either of the following:
(i) Declared a dependent of the court.
(ii) Legally committed to, or placed under the custody of, a state agency or department, or an individual or entity appointed by the court. The court shall indicate the date on which the dependency, commitment, or custody was ordered and the factual basis for making the order.
(B) That reunification of the child with one or both of the child’s parents was determined not to be viable because of abuse, neglect, abandonment, or a similar basis pursuant to California law. The court shall indicate the date on which reunification was determined not to be viable, and the factual basis for making the determination.
(C) That it is not in the best interest of the child to be returned to the child’s, or the child’s parent’s, previous country of nationality or country of last habitual residence. The court shall indicate the factual basis for making the determination. § 155. Jurisdiction of superior court to make judicial determinations regarding custody and care of children within federal Immigration and Nationality Act; Ord....
(2) The superior court may make additional determinations pursuant to this section that are supported by evidence only if requested by a party. The asserted, purported, or perceived motivation of the child seeking classification as a special immigrant juvenile shall not be admissible in making the findings under this section. The court shall not include nor reference the asserted, purported, or perceived motivation of the child seeking classification as a special immigrant juvenile in the court’s findings under this section.
(3) If a court grants an order that includes the determinations described in paragraph (1), and the person who requested the determinations has submitted a request for expedited processing accompanied by a properly conformed proposed order, the court shall provide the person who requested the determinations with a certified copy of the order within three court days of the date of the hearing at which the determinations were made, or the date the proposed order was submitted, whichever is later.
(c) In any judicial proceedings in response to a request that the superior court make the determinations necessary to support a petition for classification as a special immigrant juvenile, information regarding the child’s immigration status that is not otherwise protected by state confidentiality laws shall remain confidential and shall be available for inspection only by the court, the child who is the subject of the proceeding, the parties, the attorneys for the parties, the child’s counsel, and the child’s guardian.
(d) In any judicial proceedings in response to a request that the superior court make the findings necessary to support a petition for classification as a special immigrant juvenile, records of the proceedings that are not otherwise protected by state confidentiality laws may be sealed using the procedure set forth in California Rules of Court 2.550 and 2.551.
(e) This section shall be operative on January 1, 2025.

Plain-English Summary

Federal immigration law lets certain immigrant children petition U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services for “special immigrant juvenile” status — a path toward lawful permanent residence for a child a state court has found can’t safely reunify with a parent. But that federal petition needs specific findings from a state court first. Section 155 gives California’s superior courts the authority to make them.

Any division of the superior court that handles dependency, custody, or care of children — juvenile, probate, or family court — can issue the order, for a child up to 21 years old, regardless of what kind of proceeding is already underway. On request, and if the evidence supports it (a declaration from the child alone can be enough), the court must make three findings, each tied to the facts and to California law: that the child was declared a dependent of the court or placed in the custody of a state agency or another court-appointed guardian; that reunifying the child with one or both parents isn’t viable because of abuse, neglect, abandonment, or something similar; and that returning the child to their home country, or the country where they last habitually lived, isn’t in the child’s best interest. The court can even backdate an order (nunc pro tunc) to when those findings could have been made, without needing to show a clerical error caused the delay.

The statute also protects the child’s privacy and keeps the proceeding from turning into an immigration fight. A court can’t consider, or even mention in its findings, why the child might want special immigrant juvenile status — the findings rest only on the child’s circumstances, not their motive for seeking immigration relief. Information about the child’s immigration status stays confidential, limited to the court, the child, the parties, their attorneys, and the child’s counsel or guardian, and the records can be sealed under the California Rules of Court. If a party asks for expedited handling and submits a proposed order, the court must issue a certified copy within three court days of the hearing or the submission, whichever comes later.

Section 155 doesn’t grant immigration status itself — only the federal government can do that. It gives the state court a defined role: making the predicate findings the federal process requires, without turning the state court proceeding into an immigration adjudication.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does § 155 grant a child immigration status?

No. Section 155 only lets a California superior court make the factual findings a child needs to petition U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services for special immigrant juvenile status — the federal government decides the immigration petition itself.

Which California courts can make special immigrant juvenile findings?

Any division of the superior court handling a child’s dependency, custody, or care — including juvenile, probate, and family court — can make the findings under § 155, for a child up to 21 years old.

What three findings does a court need to make under § 155?

That the child was declared a dependent or placed in the custody of a state agency or court-appointed guardian, that reunifying with one or both parents isn’t viable because of abuse, neglect, abandonment, or something similar, and that returning the child to their home country isn’t in their best interest.

Can a court consider why a child wants special immigrant juvenile status when making these findings?

No. Section 155 bars the court from considering, or referencing in its findings, the child’s asserted or perceived motivation for seeking special immigrant juvenile classification.

Amendment History

Added Stats 2023 ch 851 § 2 (AB 1650), effective January 1, 2024, operative January 1, 2025. Amended Stats 2024 ch 955 § 1 (AB 2224), effective January 1, 2025, operative January 1, 2025.

Source & verification. Section text is reproduced verbatim from the Deering's California Codes Annotated / vLex. Enacted by the California Legislature. Last verified July 28, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: special immigrant juvenile status californiaSIJ findings california superior courtspecial immigrant juvenile findings orderSIJS california family court