RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 1510.When Intangible Personal Property Escheats to State

Title 10. Unclaimed Property · Chapter 7. Unclaimed Property Law · Article 2. Escheat of Unclaimed Personal Property · Last amended 1978 · Last verified July 29, 2026

In one sentenceSection 1510 sets the jurisdictional test for when intangible personal property escheats to California, giving first priority to the apparent owner's last known in-state address and, when no address is on file, looking to the holder's domicile or governmental status and to whether another state would otherwise claim the property.

Full Text of § 1510

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b) (c) (d)

Unless otherwise provided by statute of this state, intangible personal property escheats to this state under this chapter if the conditions for escheat stated in Sections 1513 through 1521 exist, and if:
(a) The last known address, as shown on the records of the holder, of the apparent owner is in this state.
(b) No address of the apparent owner appears on the records of the holder and:
(1) The last known address of the apparent owner is in this state; or
(2) The holder is domiciled in this state and has not previously paid the property to the state of the last known address of the apparent owner; or
(3) The holder is a government or governmental subdivision or agency of this state and has not previously paid the property to the state of the last known address of the apparent owner.
(c) The last known address, as shown on the records of the holder, of the apparent owner is in a state that does not provide by law for the escheat of such property and the holder is (1) domiciled in this state or (2) a government or governmental subdivision or agency of this state.
(d) The last known address, as shown on the records of the holder, of the apparent owner is in a foreign nation and the holder is (1) domiciled in this state or (2) a government or governmental subdivision or agency of this state.

Plain-English Summary

Before any of the specific property-type rules in this article can apply, California has to have a legitimate claim to the property in the first place, and Section 1510 supplies that threshold test. The clearest case is the simplest: if the holder's own records show the apparent owner's last known address is in California, the property escheats here once the specific conditions in Sections 1513 through 1521 are met.

When no address appears on the holder's records at all, the section falls back to secondary rules. California can still claim the property if the apparent owner's last known address was here, if the holder is domiciled in California and has not already paid the property to the state of the owner's last known address, or if the holder is a California government entity that has not made that payment either. The section then reaches further still, letting California claim property whose owner's address is in another state that does not itself provide for escheat, or in a foreign country, so long as the holder is domiciled here or is a California government entity. Together these rules keep two states from fighting over the same property while making sure it does not fall through the cracks when no state's escheat law would otherwise reach it.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the first thing that determines whether property escheats to California?

Whether the apparent owner's last known address, as shown in the holder's own records, is in California.

What happens if the holder's records show no address for the owner at all?

California can still claim the property if the owner's last known address was here, or if the holder is domiciled in California or is a California government entity and has not already paid the property to another state.

Can California claim property when the owner's address is in a state that does not have its own escheat law?

Yes, if the holder is domiciled in California or is a California government entity.

Does this section apply on its own, without the specific rules for bank deposits, dividends, and similar property?

No. Section 1510 works together with the property-specific conditions in Sections 1513 through 1521; both the jurisdictional test here and the specific dormancy conditions there must be satisfied.

Amendment History

Amended by Stats. 1978, Ch. 1183.

Source & verification. Section text is reproduced verbatim from the Deering's California Codes Annotated / vLex. Enacted by the California Legislature. Last verified July 29, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: when property escheats to californiajurisdiction over unclaimed property last known address