§ 1282.Powers and Duties of Arbitrators
Title 9. Arbitration · Chapter 3. Conduct of Arbitration Proceedings · Last amended 1998 · Last verified July 29, 2026
Full Text of § 1282
Plain-English Summary
This section only fills gaps. It applies unless the arbitration agreement says otherwise, or unless the parties agree on something else that does not conflict with that agreement. Absent either, the default is simple: a single neutral arbitrator handles the case. If the parties have appointed more than one arbitrator, the powers and duties that belong to the non-neutral arbitrators can be exercised by a majority of them, so long as all arbitrators received reasonable notice of the proceedings.
Where the panel includes more than one neutral arbitrator, a majority of the neutrals can exercise a neutral arbitrator's powers and duties. The neutrals can even delegate that authority to just one of their number, but only by unanimous agreement, and one power can never be delegated away: the power to make or correct the award. That safeguard keeps the decision itself in the hands of the full group of neutrals, even when day-to-day authority is streamlined. And if a panel somehow ends up with no neutral arbitrator at all, a majority of whatever arbitrators there are can exercise a neutral arbitrator's powers.
Frequently Asked Questions
What happens if the arbitration agreement doesn't say how many arbitrators will hear the case?
The default is a single neutral arbitrator, unless the agreement or the parties' own later agreement says otherwise.
Can a panel of neutral arbitrators hand off its authority to just one member?
Only by unanimous agreement of the neutral arbitrators, and even then, the power to make or correct the award cannot be delegated.
How is authority divided when a panel has both neutral and non-neutral arbitrators?
The non-neutral arbitrators' powers can be exercised by a majority of them with proper notice, while the neutral arbitrators' powers are exercised by a majority of the neutrals.
Does this section apply if the parties have already agreed on different procedures?
No -- it is a fallback that yields to the arbitration agreement or to a later, consistent agreement of the parties.
Amendment History
Amended by Stats. 1997, Ch. 445, Sec. 3. Effective January 1, 1998.