§ 1141.24.Discovery After Award
Title 3. Of Summary Proceedings · Chapter 2.5. Judicial Arbitration · Last amended 2005 · Last verified July 29, 2026
Full Text of § 1141.24
Plain-English Summary
Discovery is supposed to wind down, not ramp up, once an arbitration award has been filed in a case sent to arbitration under § 1141.11. Section 1141.24 confirms that: after the award, no discovery is permitted beyond what Chapter 18, commencing with § 2034.010, of Title 4 of Part 4 already allows — the rules governing expert witness discovery — unless the parties stipulate to more or the court grants leave on a showing of good cause.
The rule exists because a trial de novo, if one is requested, is supposed to move quickly toward trial rather than reopen a full discovery campaign. It also connects to § 1141.16(c)(3), which lets a court move up the arbitration hearing itself when the parties have stipulated, or the court has ordered, that broader post-award discovery will be allowed — a signal that the parties or the court have decided this case needs the extra time discovery would take.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a party conduct discovery after an arbitration award has been filed?
Only expert-witness discovery under Chapter 18, commencing with § 2034.010, of Title 4 of Part 4, unless the parties stipulate to more or the court permits it for good cause.
Why is post-award discovery so limited?
Because a trial de novo after arbitration is meant to proceed efficiently, not to reopen a full round of pretrial discovery.
Does this limit apply to every case arbitrated under this chapter?
Amendment History
Amended by Stats 2004 ch 182 (AB 3081),s 15, eff. 7/1/2005 Amended by Stats 2003 ch 449 (AB 1712),s 14, eff. 1/1/2004.