§ 1085.When Writ May Be Issued
Title 1. Of Writs of Review, Mandate, and Prohibition · Chapter 2. Writ of Mandate · Last amended 2011 · Last verified July 29, 2026
Full Text of § 1085
Plain-English Summary
This is the foundation of ordinary, or "traditional," mandamus in California. Subdivision (a) lets a court order an inferior tribunal, corporation, board, or person to do something the law specifically requires as a duty of an office, trust, or station — or to let someone in on a right or office they've been wrongly kept out of. The classic example is a purely ministerial duty: an act the law spells out clearly enough that the official or agency has no real discretion about whether to do it.
That focus on ministerial duties is what separates this general mandate remedy from § 1094.5's administrative mandamus, which reviews a final agency decision reached after a hearing where the agency exercised discretion over disputed facts. Section 1085 mandate instead compels action the law already dictates, or protects entry into a right or office already earned.
Subdivision (b) adds a narrower, more technical rule: the appellate division of the superior court can issue a writ of mandate aimed at the superior court itself, in limited civil cases and in misdemeanor or infraction cases. For that purpose only, the statute treats the superior court as an "inferior tribunal" so the rest of this chapter's procedures apply to it the same way they would to any other respondent.
Frequently Asked Questions
What kind of duty can a writ of mandate compel under § 1085?
An act the law specifically requires as a duty resulting from an office, trust, or station, or admission to a right or office the petitioner is entitled to and has been unlawfully denied.
Who can a writ of mandate be directed to?
Any inferior tribunal, corporation, board, or person who owes the legally required duty or is unlawfully withholding the right or office in question.
Can the appellate division of the superior court issue a writ against the superior court itself?
Yes, in limited civil cases and in misdemeanor or infraction cases, under § 1085(b), which treats the superior court as an inferior tribunal for that purpose.
How is this different from administrative mandamus under § 1094.5?
Section 1085 generally compels a ministerial duty or protects entry to a right or office; § 1094.5 instead reviews a final administrative decision reached after a hearing involving the agency's own fact-finding discretion.
Amendment History
Amended by Stats 2010 ch 212 (AB 2767),s 2, eff. 1/1/2011. Amended by Stats 2002 ch 784 (SB 1316),s 75, eff. 1/1/2003. Previously Amended September 7, 1999 (Bill Number: SB 210) (Chapter 344).