Rule 3.1580.Request for special findings by jury
Division 15. Trial · Chapter 8. Special Verdicts · Last amended 2007 · Last verified July 29, 2026
Full Text of Rule 3.1580
Plain-English Summary
A jury’s general verdict tells the parties who won, but it does not always say why. Special findings fill that gap by asking the jury to answer discrete factual questions along with its verdict. Rule 3.1580 sets the mechanics for requesting them: the request has to be written, not raised orally during argument or after the jury has already retired to deliberate.
Timing matters. A party who wants special findings has to present the proposed issues or questions to the judge before argument begins, unless the court has ordered a different schedule. Waiting until closing argument, or until deliberations are underway, comes too late absent a court order permitting it.
The rule also requires the questions to arrive ready to use, drafted in a form the court could hand straight to the jury, and it requires service on every other party. That advance notice lets opposing counsel object to the phrasing or scope of a proposed question before the jury ever sees it, rather than raising the issue for the first time after trial.
Frequently Asked Questions
When must a party request special jury findings in a California civil trial?
Before argument, unless the court orders otherwise, under Rule 3.1580.
What form must a request for special jury findings take?
A written submission to the judge, phrasing the specific issues or questions of fact in a form ready for submission to the jury, served on all other parties.
What is the difference between a special finding and a general verdict?
A general verdict states who prevails; special findings answer specific factual questions the jury decides along with, or as part of, that general verdict.
Amendment History
Rule 3.1580 amended and renumbered effective January 1, 2007; adopted as rule 230 effective January 1, 1949.