Rule 3.1352.Objections to evidence
Division 11. Law and Motion · Chapter 6. Particular Motions · Article 5. Summary Judgment Motions · Last amended 2007 · Last verified July 29, 2026
Full Text of Rule 3.1352
Plain-English Summary
Summary judgment papers often include declarations, deposition excerpts, and documents that one side thinks should never reach the judge’s desk — hearsay, speculation, or unauthenticated exhibits. Rule 3.1352 tells a party how to put those objections on the record. There are exactly two routes.
The first is to submit written objections that follow the detailed format Rule 3.1354 sets out. The second is to skip the paperwork and instead arrange for a court reporter to attend the hearing, so objections can be raised orally and preserved in the reporter’s transcript. Rule 3.1352 does not require both; a party picks one method for putting evidentiary objections on the record.
The choice matters because an unrecorded oral objection, made at a hearing with no reporter present, risks disappearing from the record entirely — leaving nothing for a reviewing court to examine later if the objection becomes relevant on appeal.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do you object to evidence in a California summary judgment motion?
Either submit written objections under Rule 3.1354, or arrange for a court reporter to be present at the hearing, under Rule 3.1352.
Do I need a court reporter to object to summary judgment evidence orally?
Yes. Without a reporter present, an oral objection made at the hearing risks not being preserved for the record.
Can I raise both written and oral objections under Rule 3.1352?
The rule presents the two as alternative methods; filing written objections under Rule 3.1354 is the more common and reliably documented route.
Amendment History
Rule 3.1352 amended and renumbered effective January 1, 2007; adopted as rule 343 effective January 1, 1984; previously amended effective January 1, 2002.