Rule 3.1347.Discovery motions in summary proceeding involving possession of real property
Division 11. Law and Motion · Chapter 6. Particular Motions · Article 4. Discovery Motions · Last amended 2016 · Last verified July 29, 2026
Full Text of Rule 3.1347
Plain-English Summary
Unlawful detainer cases move fast by design — California law gives eviction proceedings priority on the trial calendar and compresses the usual timelines. Rule 3.1347 carries that urgency into discovery disputes. It applies to discovery motions in unlawful detainer actions and other summary proceedings involving possession of real property, and it ties notice to the timing rules in Code of Civil Procedure section 1170.8 rather than the longer notice periods that apply to ordinary civil motions.
Opposition works differently here too. A party can oppose a discovery motion in one of two ways: standing up at the hearing and arguing orally, or filing written opposition in advance. A party who wants the written opposition considered ahead of time has to file and serve it no later than the court day before the hearing, using a method reasonably calculated to reach the other side by the close of business that day. The court retains discretion to look at a late opposition anyway, but a party cannot count on that discretion being exercised.
The net effect trims the normal discovery-motion timeline down to something that fits inside a case supposed to reach trial within weeks, not months.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do unlawful detainer discovery motions follow the same timeline as regular civil discovery motions?
No. Rule 3.1347 applies the accelerated notice provisions of Code of Civil Procedure section 1170.8 instead of the standard motion notice periods.
Can you oppose a discovery motion at the hearing instead of filing written opposition in an unlawful detainer case?
Yes. Rule 3.1347(b) allows opposition and reply to be made orally at the hearing, or in writing as described in subdivision (c).
When is written opposition due for a discovery motion in an unlawful detainer case?
On or before the court day before the hearing, served by a method reasonably calculated to reach the other party by the close of business that day, under Rule 3.1347(c).
Amendment History
Rule 3.1347 amended effective January 1, 2016; adopted effective January 1, 2009.