Rule 3.1204.Contents of notice and declaration regarding notice
Division 11. Law and Motion · Chapter 4. Ex Parte Applications · Adopted 2007 · no amendments on record · Last verified July 29, 2026
Full Text of Rule 3.1204
Plain-English Summary
Ex parte relief lets a party skip the normal noticed-motion timeline, but rule 3.1204 keeps that shortcut from becoming a surprise. When someone gives notice of an ex parte application, they must tell the opposing side, with specifics, what relief they are asking for and when and where the court will hear it. They also have to try to find out whether the other side plans to show up and oppose it, so the applicant and the court have some sense of what to expect at the hearing.
Every ex parte application must come with a declaration regarding notice, a sworn account of what happened on the notice front. The declaration has to fit one of three stories: that notice was given, with the date, time, manner, name of the person told, the relief sought, any response, and whether opposition is expected, along with confirmation that the applicant met rule 3.1203's timing requirement; that the applicant tried in good faith to reach the opposing side but could not, with the specific efforts described; or that, for stated reasons, the applicant should not have to give notice at all.
Rule 3.1203 sets 10:00 a.m. the court day before the hearing as the baseline notice deadline. When notice comes later than that, rule 3.1204(c) requires more: an explanation of the exceptional circumstances that justify the delay, or, in unlawful detainer cases, an explanation of why the shorter notice given is reasonable under the circumstances.
Frequently Asked Questions
What information does an ex parte notice have to include?
The person giving notice must state with specificity the relief being requested and the date, time, and place of the hearing, and must try to find out whether the opposing party intends to appear and oppose the application.
What is a declaration regarding notice?
It is a sworn statement, required with every ex parte application, describing either the notice that was given, the good-faith efforts made to give notice that did not succeed, or the reasons the applicant should not have to give notice at all.
What happens if ex parte notice is given after 10 a.m. the day before the hearing?
The declaration regarding notice must explain the exceptional circumstances that justify the shorter notice, or, in an unlawful detainer proceeding, why the notice given was reasonable.
Can an applicant skip giving notice of an ex parte application entirely?
Only by explaining, in the declaration regarding notice, the specific reasons the applicant should not be required to inform the opposing party — it is not an option available without justification.
Amendment History
Rule 3.1204 adopted effective January 1, 2007.