RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 82.Findings and Conclusions by the Court; Judgment on Partial Findings

Part X. Judgments and Decrees · Last amended January 1, 2019 · Last verified September 4, 2026

In one sentenceRule 82 requires findings of fact and conclusions of law if a party asks before trial, protects the right to challenge the evidence supporting them, and sets a 25-day deadline for seeking amended or additional findings.

Full Text of Rule 82

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b) (c) (d)

(a) Findings and Conclusions.
(1) Generally. If requested before trial, the court must make separate findings of fact and conclusions of law. The findings and conclusions may be stated orally on the record after the close of the evidence or may appear in an opinion, minute entry, or memorandum of decision filed by the court. Judgment must be entered under Rule 78.
(2) For a Motion. The court is not required to state findings or conclusions in a ruling on any motion unless these rules provide otherwise.
(3) Effect of a Master's Findings and Conclusions. A master's findings and conclusions become the court's findings and conclusions to the extent adopted by the court.
(4) Contesting the Evidentiary Support. A party may contest the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the findings of fact, whether or not the party requested, objected to, or moved to amend the findings.
(5) Setting Aside the Findings. Findings of fact must not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and the reviewing court must give due regard to the trial court's opportunity to judge the credibility of witnesses.
(b) Amended or Additional Findings. On a party's motion filed not later than 25 days after the entry of judgment, the court may amend or make additional findings, and may amend the judgment accordingly. This deadline may not be extended by stipulation or court order, except as allowed by Rule 4. The motion to amend or make additional findings may be included in a motion under Rule 83.
(c) Judgment on Partial Findings. If a party has been fully heard on an issue and the court finds against the party on that issue, the court may enter judgment against that party on a claim or defense that can be maintained or defeated only with a favorable finding on that issue. A judgment on partial findings must be supported by findings of fact and conclusions of law if requested as required by section (a).
(d) Submission on Agreed Statement of Facts. The parties may submit a matter in controversy to the court on an agreed statement of facts, signed by them and filed with the clerk. The court must render its decision based on the agreed statement unless it finds the statement to be insufficient.
End

Rule History

Added Aug. 30, 2018, effective Jan. 1, 2019.

Plain-English Summary

Rule 82 is short but decides how much of a trial court's reasoning a party is entitled to see -- and how much of it an appellate court can review.

The request has to come first

If requested before trial, the court must make separate findings of fact and conclusions of law. They may be stated orally on the record after the close of evidence, or appear in an opinion, minute entry or memorandum of decision. Judgment is then entered under Rule 78. The court is not required to state findings on a motion unless these rules provide otherwise.

The timing is the whole point. A party who waits until after an adverse ruling to ask why has asked too late.

Two protections for the losing party

A party may contest the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the findings whether or not that party requested findings, objected to them, or moved to amend them. No preservation step is required to argue on appeal that the evidence did not support what the court found.

And the standard of review is stated in the rule: findings of fact must not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, with due regard to the trial court's opportunity to judge the credibility of witnesses. The same standard Rule 72(h) applies to a family law master's findings.

Amended or additional findings

On motion filed not later than 25 days after entry of judgment, the court may amend or make additional findings and amend the judgment accordingly. That deadline may not be extended by stipulation or court order, except as Rule 4 allows -- the same rigidity as the Rule 83 and Rule 85 deadlines. The motion may be combined with a Rule 83 motion, which is worth noting because Rule 84 expressly forbids combining a clarification motion with one under Rule 83.

Two other provisions

A master's findings and conclusions become the court's to the extent adopted. And where a party has been fully heard on an issue and the court finds against them, the court may enter judgment on partial findings against that party on any claim or defense that can only succeed with a favorable finding on that issue -- supported by findings and conclusions if section (a) required them.

Finally, the parties may submit a matter on an agreed statement of facts they sign and file, and the court must decide on that statement unless it finds it insufficient.

Frequently Asked Questions

When do I have to ask for findings of fact?

Before trial. Rule 82(a)(1) requires the court to make separate findings of fact and conclusions of law if requested before trial.

Can I argue the evidence did not support a finding if I never objected?

Yes. Rule 82(a)(4) allows a party to contest the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the findings whether or not the party requested, objected to, or moved to amend the findings.

What standard applies to the trial court's findings?

Rule 82(a)(5) says findings of fact must not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and the reviewing court must give due regard to the trial court's opportunity to judge the credibility of witnesses.

How long do I have to ask for additional findings?

Rule 82(b) requires a motion filed not later than 25 days after the entry of judgment. That deadline may not be extended by stipulation or court order except as allowed by Rule 4, and the motion may be included in a Rule 83 motion.

Can the court rule against me mid-trial?

Rule 82(c) allows judgment on partial findings where a party has been fully heard on an issue and the court finds against that party, on a claim or defense that can be maintained or defeated only with a favorable finding on that issue.

Can we submit the case on agreed facts?

Yes. Rule 82(d) allows the parties to submit a matter on an agreed statement of facts signed by them and filed with the clerk, and requires the court to decide on that statement unless it finds it insufficient.

Source & verification. Rule text and Rule History reproduced verbatim from the Arizona Rules of Family Law Procedure as published by the Arizona Supreme Court, current through amendments effective January 1, 2026. Promulgated by the Supreme Court of Arizona (Ariz. Const. art. 6, § 5). Last verified September 4, 2026. · Official text
Also known as: findings of factconclusions of lawclearly erroneous25 daysamended findingsjudgment on partial findingsagreed statement of facts