RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 14.Written Verifications and Unsworn Declarations Under Penalty of Perjury

Part I. General Administration · Last amended January 1, 2023 · Last verified September 4, 2026

In one sentenceRule 14 lists the four documents that need a notarized verification, allows a photocopy of government-issued ID as an alternative, and lets an unsworn declaration under penalty of perjury stand in everywhere else.

Full Text of Rule 14

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b) (c)

(a) Written Verification. A written verification is a sworn statement before a notary public or other officer who is authorized to administer an oath. A verification is required for:
(1) an acceptance of service under Rule 40(f)(1);
(2) an affidavit submitted in support of an application for a default decree;
(3) a consent decree under Rule 45; or
(4) a stipulation or agreement that substantially changes the terms of a legal decision-making or parenting time order, unless the stipulation is entered in open court or through conciliation services. However, nothing in this rule precludes the Arizona Supreme Court from modifying the requirements of this rule by administrative order.
(b) Alternative Verification. For those documents that require a verification under Rule 14(a), courts may accept for filing any of the documents without notarization if they are accompanied by a photocopy of the filer's driver license or other government- issued identification document. The applicant must redact a protected address and any sensitive data as defined by Rule 43.1(f)
(1) from a driver license or other government-issued identification document. The clerk may maintain the photocopy of the license or other government-issued identification document as a confidential record and limit its availability as provided in Rule 43.1(f)(2)(B)(ii). If the alternative verification is attached to the document containing the signature, the Clerk must not maintain the document as a confidential record and must not limit its availability. A party filing a document with alternative verification attached must redact all sensitive data before filing, consistent with Rule 43.1(f)(2)(A).
(c) Unsworn Declarations Under Penalty of Perjury. Except as provided in Rule 14(a)-(b), when these rules require a verification, the requirement is satisfied if the declaration is signed by the person and is substantially in the following form: “I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated: __________ Signature: __________”.
End

Rule History

Added Aug. 30, 2018, effective Jan. 1, 2019. Amended Aug. 29, 2022, effective Jan. 1, 2023.

Plain-English Summary

Rule 14 answers a narrow practical question: when does a signature have to be notarized?

The four

A written verification — a sworn statement before a notary public or other officer authorized to administer an oath — is required for exactly four things:

  • an acceptance of service under Rule 40(f)(1);
  • an affidavit supporting an application for a default decree;
  • a consent decree under Rule 45; and
  • a stipulation or agreement that substantially changes the terms of a legal decision-making or parenting time order — unless entered in open court or through conciliation services.

The Arizona Supreme Court may modify these requirements by administrative order.

The alternative to a notary

Subsection (b) allows any of those documents to be filed without notarization if accompanied by a photocopy of the filer's driver license or other government-issued identification. The applicant must redact a protected address and any sensitive data as defined by Rule 43.1(f) from the identification document.

The clerk may keep the photocopy as a confidential record with limited availability. But note the exception: if the alternative verification is attached to the document containing the signature, the clerk must not treat it as confidential and must not limit its availability — so how the ID copy is submitted determines whether it stays private. A party filing with the alternative verification attached must redact all sensitive data before filing.

Everywhere else

Except for the four items in (a) and the alternative in (b), a verification requirement is satisfied by an unsworn declaration under penalty of perjury, signed and substantially in this form: "I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated: ______ Signature: ______".

Frequently Asked Questions

What has to be notarized in an Arizona family law case?

Rule 14(a) requires a written verification for an acceptance of service under Rule 40(f)(1), an affidavit supporting an application for a default decree, a consent decree under Rule 45, and a stipulation or agreement that substantially changes the terms of a legal decision-making or parenting time order — unless that stipulation is entered in open court or through conciliation services.

Can I file without finding a notary?

Rule 14(b) allows those documents to be filed without notarization if accompanied by a photocopy of the filer's driver license or other government-issued identification document, with a protected address and any sensitive data redacted as defined by Rule 43.1(f).

Is the copy of my ID kept private?

The clerk may maintain it as a confidential record with limited availability. But Rule 14(b) provides that if the alternative verification is attached to the document containing the signature, the clerk must not maintain it as a confidential record and must not limit its availability — and the filing party must redact all sensitive data before filing.

What is an unsworn declaration?

Rule 14(c) satisfies a verification requirement, except as provided in Rule 14(a)-(b), if the declaration is signed and substantially in the form: 'I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated: __________ Signature: __________'.

Source & verification. Rule text and Rule History reproduced verbatim from the Arizona Rules of Family Law Procedure as published by the Arizona Supreme Court, current through amendments effective January 1, 2026. Promulgated by the Supreme Court of Arizona (Ariz. Const. art. 6, § 5). Last verified September 4, 2026. · Official text
Also known as: verificationnotarizationunsworn declarationpenalty of perjurynotaryacceptance of servicealternative verification