813.02.Temporary injunction; when granted.
Ch. 813: Injunctions, Ne Exeat and Receivers · Last amended 1997 · Last verified July 15, 2026
Full Text of Section 813.02
Official Notes
Judicial Council Note, 1988: Sub. (1) (b) [created] allows the court to attempt to hold a telephone conference prior to granting a temporary injunction or temporary restraining order. The telephone conference procedure minimizes the risk of an improvident injunction and aids the court in fixing a realistic security. [Re Order effective Jan. 1, 1988]
Plain-English Summary
Section 813.02 supplies the basic standard for a temporary injunction. A court may grant one when a party’s pleading shows entitlement to a judgment that includes restraining some act whose commission or continuance during the litigation would cause injury, or when it appears during the litigation that a party is doing, threatening, or procuring some act that violates another party’s rights and would tend to make a favorable judgment worthless. Before granting that relief, the court may try to reach the party sought to be restrained, or that party’s counsel, by phone, and hear from all parties on the equities, the availability of other remedies, potential damages, and other relevant matters.
The section adds a distinct set of protections for prisoner litigation over prison or jail conditions. Before issuing that kind of injunction, the court must give notice and a chance to be heard to the attorney general, if a state correctional institution is involved, or to the attorney representing the local institution, along with other interested parties — an injunction issued without that notice is void. Any such injunction must meet the requirements of section 813.40 (1) (b), the court must give substantial weight to any adverse impact on public safety or facility operations, and the injunction expires no later than 90 days after issuance unless the court makes the required finding and makes the order final before that period runs out.
Outside the prisoner-litigation context, section 813.02 also addresses waste. After a waste action, an action to recover or partition land, or an execution levy on real estate, a party who commits waste or threatens or prepares to commit it may be restrained by injunction, issued either in that action or, in the levy situation, by the court from which the execution issued.
Finally, the section fixes a venue rule with teeth. No temporary restraining order or injunction may issue unless the application is made in a county within the judicial circuit where the case properly belongs for trial, and unless each defendant’s residence is stated, if known. A temporary restraining order or injunction issued in violation of that requirement is void.
Frequently Asked Questions
When can a Wisconsin court issue a temporary injunction under this section?
When a party’s pleading shows entitlement to judgment restraining an injurious act, or when a party is doing, threatening, or procuring an act that violates another party’s rights and would tend to render an eventual judgment ineffectual.
Can the court talk to the person I want restrained before deciding whether to grant the injunction?
Yes. The court may attempt to contact that party, or the party’s counsel if known, by telephone and hear from all parties on the equities, other available remedies, and potential damages before granting the injunction.
Are there special rules for lawsuits over prison or jail conditions?
Yes. The court must give notice and a hearing opportunity to the attorney general or the institution’s attorney before issuing that kind of injunction, and the injunction generally expires no later than 90 days after issuance unless the court makes it final.
Can a court stop someone from committing waste on land while a lawsuit is pending?
Yes. In a waste action, a land recovery or partition action, or after a levy by execution, a party who commits or threatens to commit waste may be restrained by injunction.
What happens if a temporary injunction is issued in the wrong county?
It is void. The application must be made in a county within the judicial circuit where the case properly belongs for trial, and each defendant’s residence must be stated if known.
Amendment History
History: Sup. Ct. Order, 67 Wis. 2d 760; Stats. 1975 s. 813.02; Sup. Ct. Order, 141 Wis. 2d xiii (1987); 1993 a. 112, 486; 1995 a. 400; 1997 a. 133.