801.02.Commencement of action.
Ch. 801: Commencement of Action and Venue · Last amended 2015 · Last verified July 15, 2026
Full Text of Section 801.02
Official Notes
Judicial Council Note, 1981: Sub. (1) is amended to allow an action seeking an extraordinary remedy to be commenced in the same manner as any other civil action. Sub. (5) allows the additional option of using an order to shorten the time for filing a response to the complaint in lieu of a summons. This option is for the emergency situation when the case may be moot before a response would be filed. The order serves the same purpose as the alternative writ and the order to show cause used to initiate the action under writ procedures. In all other matters of procedure, the rules of civil procedure govern to the extent applicable. Sub. (5) applies only to procedure in the circuit court. In seeking an extraordinary remedy in the supreme court or court of appeals, s. 809.51, stats., should be followed. [Bill 613-A]
Plain-English Summary
Section 801.02 answers a question every plaintiff needs answered before doing anything else: when does a case officially start? For a lawsuit seeking a personal judgment, the action is commenced against a given defendant once the summons and complaint naming that defendant are filed with the court — but only if an authenticated copy is then served on the defendant within 90 days of filing. An in rem or quasi in rem action (one aimed at a status, property, or thing rather than a person’s pocketbook) works the same way, except the complaint copy can sometimes be replaced by a notice of the object of the action. The original summons and complaint must be filed together, and the served copies generally go out together too, with narrow exceptions for service by publication and for in rem cases using a notice of object of action instead of the complaint.
The section also covers a handful of related mechanics: no service can happen before the action is properly commenced; fees are due to the clerk at filing; and certain extraordinary remedies — certiorari, quo warranto, habeas corpus, mandamus, or prohibition — can be commenced either by serving an original writ or by filing a complaint along with a court order that may shorten the usual time to answer.
A large share of the section is devoted to civil actions brought by prisoners over prison or jail conditions. Before filing that kind of case, a prisoner has to exhaust every administrative remedy the facility has made available, generally comply with the state’s notice-of-claim statutes, and attach documentation proving that exhaustion when the case is filed. Wisconsin courts must also dismiss a prisoner’s case seeking a filing-fee waiver if that prisoner has had three or more earlier actions dismissed for the reasons the statute lists, unless the prisoner is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. Together these provisions steer prisoner litigation toward the facility’s own grievance process first and discourage repeated meritless filings.
Frequently Asked Questions
When does a lawsuit officially start in Wisconsin?
For a case seeking a personal judgment, the action is commenced as to a defendant once the summons and complaint naming that person are filed with the court, provided an authenticated copy is served on the defendant within 90 days after filing, under section 801.02.
Do the summons and complaint have to be served together?
Generally yes. Section 801.02 requires the authenticated copies to be served together, with two exceptions: when service is by publication, only the summons is published (though a complaint copy must be mailed with it), and in an in rem or quasi in rem action, a notice of the object of the action may accompany the summons instead of the complaint.
Can service happen before a case is officially commenced?
No. Section 801.02 says no service may be made until the action has already been commenced by filing the summons and complaint as the section requires.
What must a prisoner do before suing over conditions in prison or jail?
Section 801.02 requires the prisoner to first exhaust all available administrative remedies the facility has established, generally comply with the state’s notice-of-claim requirements, and include documentation of that exhaustion with the initial pleading.
Can a Wisconsin court dismiss a prisoner’s lawsuit because of earlier dismissed cases?
Yes. If a prisoner seeks to proceed without prepaying fees and has had three or more prior actions dismissed for the reasons listed in section 801.02, the court must dismiss the new action, unless the prisoner is in imminent danger of serious physical injury.
Amendment History
History: Sup. Ct. Order, 67 Wis. 2d 585, 589 (1975); 1975 c. 218; 1981 c. 289, 317; 1995 a. 27; 1997 a. 133, 187; 2001 a. 16; Sup. Ct. Order No. 03-06A, 2005 WI 86, 280 Wis. 2d xiii; 2007 a. 20; 2015 a. 55.