801.58.Substitution of judge.
Ch. 801: Commencement of Action and Venue · Last amended 2021 · Last verified July 15, 2026
Full Text of Section 801.58
Official Notes
Judicial Council Note, 1977: Section 801.58 of the statutes has been changed in a number of significant ways. The statute states that a substitution of judge request in a civil action or proceeding is timely only if made before the hearing of a preliminary contested matter, codifying Pure Milk Products Coop. v. NFO, 64 Wis. 2d 241 (1974). A new provision has been added to allow the parties to a criminal action or proceeding, the prosecuting attorney, and the original and the new judge to agree to have the matter referred back to the original judge. This will aid the administration of justice in those cases where it is advantageous for everyone concerned to have the original judge take back the matter. [Bill 74-S]
Judicial Council Committee’s Note, 1977: Sub. (1) is amended to give a plaintiff 60 days from the time the summons and complaint are filed or a defendant or any added party 60 days after service of a summons and complaint upon them to request a substitution of a new judge, provided no preliminary contested matters have been argued by the requester. The previous time periods for requesting a substitution of judge (i.e., 10 days after the date of notice for a scheduling conference or 10 days after service of a standard scheduling order) are repealed as the use of such a conference or order is no longer mandatory under s. 802.10. [Re Order effective July 1, 1978]
Judicial Council Note, 1981: Sub. (2) has been revised to allow the clerk to refer the substitution request to the chief judge of the judicial administrative district when the judge whose substitution has been requested fails to determine within 7 days whether the request is timely made and in proper form. Sub. (7) has been amended to clarify that the 20-day time period for filing a substitution request after an appellate remand commences upon the filing of the remittitur in the trial court. Rohl v. State, 97 Wis. 2d 514 (1980). [Bill 163-S]
Plain-English Summary
Section 801.58 gives parties a right to remove the assigned judge from their case without having to show a disqualifying interest under the previous section — a peremptory substitution, available on request rather than for cause. Any party can file a signed written request with the clerk of courts, but timing matters: the request must come before the hearing of any preliminary contested matter, and, for the plaintiff, within 60 days after the summons and complaint are filed; for any other party, within 60 days after being served. If a new judge gets assigned to try the case, the window shrinks to 10 days after notice of that assignment, or just 24 hours if the notice arrives less than 10 days before trial; if notice comes less than 24 hours before trial, the case proceeds before that judge unless the parties stipulate otherwise. Whoever files the request must promptly serve a copy on every other party.
Once the clerk receives a request, the clerk contacts the named judge to check whether it was timely and properly made. If so, that judge loses further jurisdiction over the case, and the clerk requests assignment of a replacement. If the named judge finds the request wasn’t timely or proper, the requesting party can seek review from the chief judge of the judicial district within 10 days; if the named judge doesn’t rule within 7 days, the clerk refers the matter to the chief judge directly. When a substitution is granted, most ex parte orders from the original judge stay in effect, though certain domestic-abuse and harassment restraining orders get extended until the new judge holds a hearing on an injunction.
Each party generally gets only one substitution request per action, and a request can’t name more than one judge; parties who are united in interest and pleading together count as a single party for this limit, though any one of them can file without needing the others’ consent. The original and newly assigned judges, with the agreement of all parties, can transfer the case back to the original judge. Probate matters get their own variation, letting a party request substitution for just one specific issue rather than the whole proceeding. And if an appellate court reverses or orders a new trial requiring further proceedings, any party gets a fresh opportunity to request a substitution within 20 days after the remittitur is filed in the trial court, regardless of whether a request was made earlier in the case.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long does a plaintiff have to request a substitution of judge in Wisconsin?
Section 801.58 gives the plaintiff 60 days after the summons and complaint are filed, and it requires the request to be filed before the hearing of any preliminary contested matter.
What if a new judge is assigned to my case shortly before trial?
Section 801.58 shortens the window in that situation: the request must be made within 10 days of receiving notice of the new assignment, or within 24 hours if the notice arrives less than 10 days before trial. If notice comes less than 24 hours before trial, the case proceeds before that judge unless the parties stipulate otherwise.
Can I file more than one substitution request in the same Wisconsin case?
Generally no. Section 801.58 limits each party to one written request per action and prohibits naming more than one judge in a single request, apart from the specific exception for a case sent back after a successful appeal.
What happens to the original judge’s ex parte orders after a substitution is granted?
Section 801.58 says most ex parte orders remain in effect on their existing terms, except that certain domestic-abuse and harassment restraining orders are extended until the newly assigned judge holds a hearing on an injunction.
Can I request a new judge again if my case is sent back to the trial court after an appeal?
Yes. Section 801.58 allows any party to file a substitution request within 20 days after the remittitur is filed in the trial court, whether or not a request was already filed before the appeal.
Amendment History
History: 1971 c. 46, 138, 296; Sup. Ct. Order, 67 Wis. 2d 585, 757 (1975); Stats. 1975 s. 801.58; 1977 c. 135 ss. 7, 15, 16; 1977 c. 187 s. 135; Sup. Ct. Order, 82 Wis. 2d ix (1978); 1977 c. 449; 1979 c. 175 ss. 50, 53; 1981 c. 137; 1987 a. 68; 2013 a. 322; Sup. Ct. Order No. 20-07, 2021 WI 37, 397 Wis. 2d xiii.