Rule 84.Forms
Group XII: General Provisions · Last amended February 14, 2022 · Last verified July 14, 2026
Full Text of Rule 84
Notes
Reporter’s Notes—2022 Amendment: Rule 84 is amended concurrently with the abrogation of the Appendix of Forms. Rule 84 and the Appendix of Forms were originally adopted with the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure in 1971 on the model of the 1938 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Those forms were intended not only to be “sufficient” but to illustrate the liberality and flexibility in pleading exemplified by the “short and plain statement” of a claim or defense called for by V.R.C.P. 8. See 1971 Reporter’s Notes to V.R.C.P. 8, 84. Federal Rule 84 and the federal Appendix of Forms were abrogated in 2015. The accompanying federal Advisory Committee’s Note says, in part: The purpose of providing illustrations for the rules [in the Appendix of Forms], although useful when the rules were adopted, has been fulfilled. Accordingly, recognizing that there are many alternative sources for forms, including the website of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts . . . ., Rule 84 and the Appendix of Forms are no longer necessary and have been abrogated. The abrogation of Rule 84 does not alter existing pleading standards or otherwise change the requirements of Civil Rule 8. For at least five years, the Vermont Court Administrator’s office has been publishing new and amended forms on the Judiciary website in a “Forms Library,” which now contains a great number and wide variety of detailed forms addressing matters beyond the scope of those in the former Appendix and published in a format appropriate for electronic filing. See https://www.vermontjudiciary.org/forms-library. The present amendment of Rule 84 establishes the Judiciary website as the primary source of forms and reflects the reality that approval is now the Court Administrator’s responsibility. The amended rule continues to indicate that the forms are sufficient under the rules and provide the standards of simplicity and brevity. In applying those standards, the Supreme Court, in the leading case of Colby v. Umbrella, Inc., 2008 VT 20, 184 Vt. 1, 955 A.2d 1082, 2008 Vt. LEXIS 23 (2008), using V.R.C.P. Form 9 as an example, stated that “The complaint is a bare bones statement that merely provides the defendant with notice of the claims against it. . . . Its purpose is to initiate the cause of action, not prove the merits of the plaintiff’s case.” That principle, together with the requirements of V.R.C.P. 8(a) and (e)(1) for brevity and simplicity, will serve as both interpretive and drafting guidance for continuing revision and development of forms on the Judiciary website.
Reporter’s Notes: This rule is similar to Federal Rule 84, but it permits the Court, consistent with the power to make “general rules with respect to . . . forms” conferred by 12 V.S.A. § 1, to revise or add forms without going through the formal amendment process required by that Act. Note that the forms in the appendix are not merely illustrative. They are expressly declared to be “sufficient under the rules.”
Amendment History
Amended Dec. 13, 2021, eff. Feb. 14, 2022.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 84 is short but useful: any form the Court Administrator approves and posts on the Judiciary website is good enough to satisfy the civil rules. More than that, those forms model the kind of plain, uncomplicated pleading the rules are built around — a complaint does not need elaborate detail to do its job.
The rule once pointed to a printed Appendix of Forms bound with the rules themselves, but that appendix has been abrogated. The Court Administrator's office now maintains a "Forms Library" directly on the Judiciary website, covering far more ground than the old print appendix ever did and built for electronic filing. Rule 84 was updated to reflect that shift, but its underlying point has not changed: the approved forms remain "sufficient under the rules" and continue to set the standard for the simplicity and brevity Rule 8 calls for in pleading.
The rule also confirms who is responsible for keeping the forms current — the Court Administrator, rather than a formal rule-amendment process for every change. That flexibility lets the forms library keep pace with new practice areas and electronic-filing requirements without holding up every update behind the rulemaking process.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where can I find the official forms referenced in Rule 84?
On the Judiciary website, in the Forms Library the Court Administrator maintains and updates, which has replaced the older printed Appendix of Forms.
Are the approved forms just examples, or must I use them?
The rule declares them "sufficient under the rules," meaning a properly completed approved form satisfies pleading requirements. They also illustrate the brevity and simplicity the rules contemplate more generally.
Who decides which forms are approved?
The Court Administrator, who may now or in the future approve and publish forms on the Judiciary website under Rule 84.
Does using an approved form change the pleading standards of Rule 8?
No. The forms are meant to satisfy and illustrate existing pleading standards, not to alter the requirements of Rule 8 for a short and plain statement of a claim or defense.
Is there still a printed Appendix of Forms bound with the rules?
No. That appendix has been abrogated, and the Judiciary website's Forms Library is now the primary source for the forms Rule 84 addresses.