Rule 16.Pre-trial procedure: Formulating issues
Group III: Pleadings and Motions · Not amended since adoption on record · Last verified July 13, 2026
Full Text of Rule 16
Notes
Note: This Rule 16 is similar to the Federal Rule, with the exceptions noted below. The proposal preserves present Circuit Rule 43, as revised in 1981, except to denote the pre-trial as a hearing, and by requiring a pre-trial order, reciting the action taken at the pre-trial hearing. The session is a "hearing" rather than a "conference." Present State pre-trial conferences often do not produce concrete results since no court order follows. Rule 16(e) is added to allow an informal status conference shortly before trial to dispose of any remaining matters. An order may be entered in writing or stated upon the record on any ruling the court deems necessary when this informal conference may be held in the action. The aim of the Rule is to produce a meaningful pre-trial hearing in complex and difficult cases, and to avoid such hearings in routine actions. The allowance for informal conferences immediately before trial enables the court to dispose of remaining pre-trial matters, including settlements, in any and all cases.
Note to 1993 Amendment: The amendment provides that all pre-trial briefs and memoranda, required by 16(c) or permitted under 16(e), be served upon all parties at the same time and by the same means as is used to serve the court. The pre-trial brief is solely for the use of the court and does not restrict a party in the presentation of its case.
Note to 2011 Amendment: The amendments to Rules 16, 26, 33, 34, 37 and 45 of the South Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure concerning electronic discovery are substantially similar to the corresponding provisions in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The rules concerning electronic discovery are intended to provide a practical, efficient and cost-effective method to assure reasonable discovery. Pursuit of electronic discovery must relate to the claims and defenses asserted in the pleadings and should serve as a means for facilitating a just and cost-effective resolution of disputes.
Plain-English Summary
Once every pleading in a case has been filed and served, Rule 16(a) lets the court, on its own initiative or a party's motion, call the attorneys in for a pre-trial hearing. The list of topics the rule invites the court to take up is broad: narrowing the issues, considering amendments, exploring what facts and documents the parties will admit, limiting expert witnesses, capping discovery time, referring matters to a master, and clearing out pending motions. The rule also expects the attorneys to come prepared — able to state what facts they can prove, the legal questions at stake, the damages claimed, and to have exchanged witness and exhibit lists, agreed on undisputed facts, and made good-faith settlement offers.
Rule 16(b) requires a written order after the hearing. That order records what happened, what amendments were allowed, what the parties agreed to, and it narrows the case to the issues still in dispute. Once entered, it controls how the rest of the case proceeds unless the court later modifies it, whether on motion or at trial to avoid an unjust result. The court has discretion to go further, barring undisclosed witnesses or exhibits from trial, treating unaddressed pending motions as abandoned, continuing the hearing to a later date, or setting ground rules for e-discovery and for how the parties will handle privilege claims over material produced during discovery.
Rule 16(c) sets out a standard format for pre-trial briefs: a plain statement of the facts, the facts still in dispute, the legal issues, a list of exhibits and witnesses, any unusual evidentiary wrinkles, and a report on settlement talks. These briefs are for the judge's use at the hearing only — they don't become part of the case record. Rule 16(d) lets the chief administrative judge in a circuit maintain a calendar for scheduling these hearings, and Rule 16(e) adds a lighter-weight option: an informal status conference shortly before trial to clear up loose ends, including settlement, without the formality of a full pre-trial hearing or brief.
Frequently Asked Questions
When can a South Carolina court hold a Rule 16 pre-trial hearing?
Once all the pleadings in the action have been filed and served, the court may call a pre-trial hearing on its own initiative or on a party's motion.
What has to happen at a pre-trial hearing?
The attorneys must be ready to address items like simplifying the issues, possible amendments, admissions of fact, limits on expert witnesses and discovery time, and pending motions, and to come prepared with facts they can prove, legal authority, damages claims, witness and exhibit lists, and settlement offers.
What is a pre-trial order, and why does it matter?
Rule 16(b) requires the court to issue a written order after the hearing recording what was decided and narrowing the case to the issues still in dispute. That order controls the rest of the case unless later modified, so it effectively locks in what will and won't be litigated at trial.
Do pre-trial briefs become part of the case file?
No. Rule 16(c) states that pre-trial briefs are solely for the judge's use at the pre-trial hearing and are not filed with, or made part of, the record.
What is a status conference under Rule 16(e), and how is it different from a pre-trial hearing?
A status conference is an informal session the trial judge may hold shortly before trial to handle remaining matters, including settlement. Unlike a full pre-trial hearing, it doesn't require a pre-trial brief or the other formal procedures Rule 16(a) through (d) describe.
Can a Rule 16 order address electronic discovery?
Yes. Rule 16(b) lets the court's order establish provisions for the disclosure or discovery of electronically stored information, along with agreements on how the parties will assert privilege claims over material produced.