Rule 12.Defenses and objections — when and how presented — by pleading or motion — motion for judgment on pleadings
Group III: Pleadings and Motions · Not amended since adoption on record · Last verified July 13, 2026
Full Text of Rule 12
Notes
Note: This Rule 12(a) is identical to the Federal Rule except that it changes the time to answer from 20 to 30 days, and the time to plead after motion denied from 10 to 15 days. No other changes in State practice are affected by the Rule.
Note to 1986 Amendment: The amendment to Rule 12(a)(2) sets the time for response after a motion to strike at 15 days, which is the same time set for pleading after a successful motion for a more definite statement.
Note to 1995 Amendment: Rule 12(a) is amended to provide special time periods for the State to respond to applications for post- conviction relief because the thirty day time period for civil litigation is often extended so that the State may obtain a transcript of the proceeding before responding.
Note: This important Rule 12(b) enables a party to: (1) raise by motion or answer all of the defenses now raised by demurrer, and (2) eliminates the necessity of the awkward "special appearance to object to jurisdiction" under present State practice. The motion should be made before answer for early disposition of cases; but the defenses enumerated may be made in the responsive pleading and are not waived by being stated in a pleading rather than by motion. The last sentence eliminates the so-called "speaking demurrer" at trial, by treating such late motion as a motion for Summary Judgment under Rule 56.
Note to 1986 Amendment: The amendment to the fourth sentence of Rule 12(b) clarifies the litigant's right to assert at trial any defenses as well as any claims he could have raised in a permissive pleading but chose not to do so. Consequently, the election not to reply to an affirmative defense does not waive the right to contest that affirmative defense.
Note: This Rule 12(c) preserves the present common law practice in this State; and it is more important than the Federal Rule, because of the requirement for fact pleading. It may also be treated as a motion for summary judgment in proper circumstances.
Note: This Rule 12(d) is the same as the Federal Rule, and assures timely disposal of 12(b) and 12(c) motions to dismiss or for judgment prior to trial.
Note: This Rule 12(e) is the same as the Federal Rule and effects no change in present practice, except time for compliance is changed from 10 days to 15 days.
Note: This Rule 12(f) preserves present State practice under Code § 15-13-60 and > § 15-13-440 verbatim.
Note to 1986 Amendment: The amendment to Rule 12(f) makes clear that a motion to strike must point out the defects complained of, and is consistent with the language of Rule 12(e).
Note: This Rule 12(g) is the same as the Federal Rule. It is new material to help prevent piecemeal presentation of defenses by separate motions.
Note: This Rule 12(h) should be read together with Rule 12(g) in defining those defenses which are waived if not presented by pleading or motion.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 12(a) fixes the clock for responding to a pleading: a defendant generally has 30 days after service of the complaint to answer, a party served with a cross-claim has 30 days to answer it, and a plaintiff has 30 days to reply to a counterclaim. The State gets extended deadlines — 60 or 90 days — to respond to an application for post-conviction relief, depending on whether it arises from a guilty plea or a trial. Filing certain motions resets these deadlines: if the court denies or defers a motion, the responsive pleading is due 15 days after notice of the ruling; the same 15-day period applies after an order granting a more definite statement or after the court's action on a motion to strike.
Rule 12(b) is the heart of the rule and the one most often invoked at the outset of a case. Instead of raising every defense in the answer, a party may raise eight specific defenses by pretrial motion: lack of subject matter jurisdiction, lack of personal jurisdiction, improper venue, insufficiency of process, insufficiency of service of process, failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, failure to join a party required under Rule 19, and the pendency of another action between the same parties on the same claim. The sixth of these — failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action — is South Carolina's version of what other jurisdictions call a 12(b)(6) motion or a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, and it tests whether the pleaded facts, taken as true, add up to a legal claim at all. None of the eight defenses is waived merely because it's raised in a pleading rather than by separate motion. And if a motion attacking the sufficiency of the pleading brings in matters outside the pleading itself that the court doesn't exclude, Rule 12(b) converts the motion into one for summary judgment under Rule 56, with both sides getting a fair chance to submit supporting material.
The remaining subsections round out the framework. Rule 12(c) allows a motion for judgment on the pleadings once pleading is complete, with the same conversion-to-summary-judgment mechanism if outside matters come in. Rule 12(d) requires the enumerated defenses, judgment-on-the-pleadings motions, and summary judgment motions to be heard and decided before trial unless the court defers them. Rule 12(e) lets a party seek a more definite statement when a pleading is too vague to answer, with 15 days to comply once ordered. Rule 12(f) allows a motion to strike insufficient defenses or scandalous, immaterial, or redundant matter. Rule 12(g) requires a party to consolidate available defenses into a single motion rather than file them piecemeal. And Rule 12(h) sorts defenses into two buckets: personal jurisdiction, venue, and process-related defenses are waived if not raised early, while failure to state a cause of action, failure to join an indispensable party, and lack of subject matter jurisdiction can be raised well into the case — subject matter jurisdiction can be raised, or noticed by the court on its own, at any time.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is South Carolina's equivalent of a 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss?
Rule 12(b)(6) lets a party move to dismiss for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action — South Carolina's version of the federal failure-to-state-a-claim motion, testing whether the pleaded facts support a legal claim.
How many defenses can be raised by motion instead of in the answer?
Rule 12(b) lists eight: lack of subject matter jurisdiction, lack of personal jurisdiction, improper venue, insufficiency of process, insufficiency of service of process, failure to state a cause of action, failure to join a party under Rule 19, and another action pending on the same claim.
How long does a defendant have to answer a complaint?
Rule 12(a) generally gives a defendant 30 days after service of the complaint, though motions filed under the rule can reset that deadline.
What happens if a motion to dismiss relies on evidence outside the complaint?
Rule 12(b) converts the motion into one for summary judgment under Rule 56 whenever the court considers matters outside the pleading, and both sides get a chance to submit their own supporting material.
Can I lose the right to challenge personal jurisdiction if I wait too long?
Yes. Rule 12(h)(1) treats defenses like lack of personal jurisdiction, improper venue, and insufficient service as waived if they aren't raised in an early motion or the responsive pleading.
Can a court dismiss a case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on its own, without a motion?
Yes. Rule 12(h)(3) requires the court to dismiss whenever it appears, by suggestion of the parties or otherwise, that subject matter jurisdiction is lacking.
Is failure to state a claim ever too late to raise?
No. Rule 12(h)(2) allows that defense — along with failure to join an indispensable party — to be raised in any pleading, by a motion for judgment on the pleadings, or even at trial.