Rule 18.Counsel
Group IV: Parties and their Representatives · Last amended October 1, 2013 · Last verified July 14, 2026
Full Text of Rule 18
Amendment History
Adopted May 22, 2013, eff. October 1, 2013.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 18 covers three narrow but practical points about counsel. First, when a party changes lawyers or non-attorney representatives while a case is pending, the new representative must file an Appearance, tying back into the filing requirement in Rule 17.
Second, the rule addresses the advocate-witness problem: a lawyer who has testified for a client in a jury trial generally cannot then also act as that client’s advocate in the same trial, unless the Rules of Professional Conduct permit it. This keeps the roles of witness and advocate separate in front of a jury.
Third, the rule bars an attorney from serving as surety or guarantor on any bond or undertaking in a proceeding, closing off a conflict between a lawyer’s financial stake and the lawyer’s professional duties.
Frequently Asked Questions
What happens when a party changes lawyers during a pending case?
Rule 18(a) requires the new attorney or non-attorney representative to file an Appearance, consistent with Rule 17.
Can a lawyer testify for a client and then argue the case to the jury?
Generally no. Rule 18(b) bars an attorney or non-attorney representative from taking part in a jury trial after testifying for the client in it, unless acting as an advocate would be permitted under Rule 3.7 of the Rules of Professional Conduct.
Can an attorney act as a guarantor on a bond in a case they are handling?
No. Rule 18(c) states that no attorney may be surety or guarantor of any bond or undertaking in any proceeding.
Does Rule 18 apply to non-attorney representatives as well as lawyers?
Yes, at least as to changing representatives. Rule 18(a) requires a new appearance whether the party changes to a new attorney or a new non-attorney representative.
Why does Rule 18 limit a testifying lawyer’s advocacy role?
The rule keeps the roles of witness and advocate separate before a jury, permitting a testifying lawyer to continue as advocate only where Rule 3.7 of the Rules of Professional Conduct allows it.