Art. 253.1.Pleadings; Random Assignment of Cases
Title I. Courts · Chapter 5. Clerks · Enacted 1995 · no amendments on record · Last verified July 30, 2026
Full Text of Art. 253.1
Amendment History
Acts 1995, No. 829, §1.
Plain-English Summary
Which judge hears a case can matter a great deal to the people in it, so Louisiana takes the choice out of anyone's hands. Article 253.1 requires filed cases to be assigned to a section or division of the court at random, using one of two methods.
A court can draw indiscriminately from a pool holding a designation for each section or division, the way a raffle works. Or it can use a computer or electronic device programmed to make the same kind of random pick automatically. Either way, no one — not the clerk, not a party, not a lawyer — chooses which judge gets the case.
The point is fairness, and the appearance of fairness. Random assignment keeps a plaintiff from steering a case toward a judge thought to be sympathetic, and it spreads the court's caseload evenly across its sections.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why are Louisiana civil cases assigned to judges randomly?
Random assignment keeps any party from choosing a judge believed to favor their side and spreads cases evenly across the court's sections or divisions.
How does random assignment work?
A court either draws a section or division designation indiscriminately from a pool, or uses a computer program built to make that same kind of random pick.
Can I request a specific judge or division when I file suit?
No. Article 253.1 requires random assignment, though narrow exceptions elsewhere in this chapter allow a later transfer by agreement or a duty judge's limited involvement.