RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 9-13-78.Control of execution after payment — By joint debtor

Chapter 13. Executions and Judicial Sales · Article 4. Satisfaction or Discharge of Judgment and Execution · Last amended 1933 · Last verified July 17, 2026

In one sentenceO.C.G.A. § 9-13-78 gives a joint judgment debtor who pays more than his proportionate share full power to control and use the execution against principals or cosureties, by having the payment entered on the execution, without being compelled to sue the codebtors separately for the excess.

Full Text of § 9-13-78

Text size

When judgments have been obtained against several persons and one of them has paid more than his just proportion of the same, he may have full power to control and use the execution as securities in execution control the same against principals or cosureties by having this payment entered on the execution issued to enforce the judgment, and he shall not be compelled to bring an action against the codebtors for the excess of payment on the judgment.

Plain-English Summary

When a judgment runs against several people jointly, the burden of paying it does not always split evenly in practice — one debtor may end up covering more than his fair share while the others pay less or nothing. This section gives that overpaying debtor a way to even the score without starting a new lawsuit. He may control and use the execution against the principals or cosureties, the same way a security who pays off an execution can under the preceding Code section, by having his payment entered on the execution issued to enforce the judgment.

That entry is what activates the debtor's control. Once the excess payment is noted on the execution, the paying debtor can use that same execution to pursue the codebtors for the amount he covered beyond his own proportionate share, rather than treating the execution as fully spent and satisfied.

The statute is explicit that a separate lawsuit is not required. The paying debtor shall not be compelled to bring an action against the codebtors for the excess of payment on the judgment — the entry-on-the-execution mechanism stands in for that separate suit, letting him recover through the same collection machinery already in place.

Frequently Asked Questions

What can a joint judgment debtor do after paying more than his fair share?

O.C.G.A. § 9-13-78 lets him control and use the execution against the principals or cosureties by having the payment entered on the execution issued to enforce the judgment.

Does the overpaying debtor have to file a separate lawsuit against his codebtors?

No. The statute states he shall not be compelled to bring an action against the codebtors for the excess payment.

How does the paying debtor activate his right to control the execution?

By having the excess payment entered on the execution issued to enforce the judgment.

Does this section apply the same way it applies to a security who pays off an execution?

The statute describes it as the same power securities in execution have to control the execution against principals or cosureties, extending that treatment to a joint debtor who overpays.

What amount can the paying debtor recover through this mechanism?

The excess he paid beyond his own just proportion of the judgment.

Amendment History

Ga. L. 1871-72, p. 54, § 1; Code 1873, § 3599; Code 1882, § 3599; Civil Code 1895, § 5376; Civil Code 1910, § 5971; Code 1933, § 39-608.

Source & verification. Section text and amendment history are reproduced verbatim from the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, published by the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, Georgia Code Revision Commission / LexisNexis. Last verified July 17, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: georgia joint debtor pays more than share executioncontribution among judgment debtors georgiacontrol execution against cosureties georgiaoverpaying codebtor recover excess georgia