§ 575.2.Failure to Comply With Local Rules
Title 7a. Pretrial Conferences · Last amended 2003 · Last verified July 28, 2026
Full Text of § 575.2
Plain-English Summary
Local rules only have force if courts can enforce them. Section 575.2 supplies that enforcement mechanism. Subdivision (a) lets local rules adopted under § 575.1 provide that a court -- on a party's motion or on its own motion -- can strike out all or part of a pleading, dismiss the action or part of it, enter a default judgment, or impose some lesser penalty against any counsel, party represented by counsel, or self-represented party who doesn't comply with the rule's requirements. The court can also order that party or counsel to pay the moving party's reasonable expenses, including attorney's fees, for bringing the motion.
That power isn't unchecked. No penalty can be imposed without giving the party facing it notice and an opportunity to be heard first -- a due-process safeguard built directly into subdivision (a).
Subdivision (b) states a legislative preference rather than a hard rule: when noncompliance is counsel's responsibility and not the party's, the Legislature intends the penalty to land on counsel and not adversely affect the party's cause of action or defense. That preference matters in practice -- a court applying this section is expected to ask whose failure caused the problem before deciding who bears the consequence.
Frequently Asked Questions
What penalties can a court impose for violating local court rules?
Striking all or part of a pleading, dismissing the action or part of it, entering a default judgment, lesser penalties as otherwise provided by law, and an order to pay the moving party's reasonable expenses and attorney's fees.
Does the court have to give notice before imposing a penalty under § 575.2?
Yes, no penalty may be imposed without prior notice to, and an opportunity to be heard by, the party against whom it's sought.
If my lawyer misses a local-rule requirement, could I lose my case as a result?
Section 575.2(b) states the Legislature's intent that when counsel is responsible for noncompliance, the penalty should fall on counsel and not adversely affect the party's cause of action or defense.
Amendment History
Amended by Stats 2002 ch 806 (AB 3027),s 14, eff. 1/1/2003.