§ 490.060.Right to Recover Damages On Common Law Theory Not Limited
Title 6.5. Attachment · Chapter 10. Liability for Wrongful Attachment · Enacted 1974 · no amendments on record · Last verified July 28, 2026
Full Text of § 490.060
Plain-English Summary
The wrongful-attachment remedy in §§ 490.010 and 490.020 is not the only avenue open to a defendant harmed by an attachment. Section 490.060 makes clear that nothing in this chapter limits the right to sue on any common law theory -- malicious prosecution or abuse of process, for example -- arising from an attachment or protective order.
Because § 490.020(b) caps statutory wrongful-attachment liability at the amount of the undertaking, this savings clause matters for a defendant whose actual harm exceeds that cap. A separate common law claim is not bound by the statutory ceiling the way a § 490.010 claim is.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does this chapter's wrongful-attachment remedy replace common law claims like malicious prosecution?
No. Section 490.060 states that nothing in this chapter limits the right to recover for attachment-related damages on any common law theory of recovery.
Why would a common law claim matter if § 490.020 already provides a remedy?
Section 490.020(b) caps statutory wrongful-attachment liability at the undertaking amount, while a common law claim preserved by § 490.060 is not tied to that same statutory cap.
Amendment History
Added by Stats. 1974, Ch. 1516.