§ 430.90.Time to Respond When Case Remanded For Improper Removal to Federal Court
Title 6. Of the Pleadings In Civil Actions · Chapter 3. Objections to Pleadings; Denials and Defenses · Article 1. Objections to Pleadings · Enacted 1995 · no amendments on record · Last verified July 28, 2026
Full Text of § 430.90
Plain-English Summary
Section 430.90 addresses a narrow but recurring problem: a case removed to federal court, then remanded because the removal was improper, without the defendant ever having filed a response in the original state court. This section resets the response clock.
If the defendant never generally appeared in either court, subdivision (a)(1) gives 30 days from the original court's receipt of the case on remand to move to dismiss under § 583.250 or to move to quash, stay, or dismiss under § 418.10 — unless the original court already ruled on a similar motion before removal. If the defendant never filed an answer in the original court, subdivision (a)(2) gives 30 days from that same receipt date to either answer the complaint, or demur or move to strike, provided no answer was filed in federal court and no demurrer or motion to strike raising similar issues was already filed and ruled on before removal or in federal court before remand. If that demurrer or motion to strike is then denied, the defendant gets 30 days to answer, unless an answer was already filed alongside it.
Subdivision (b) fixes the reference point for all these deadlines: they run from the date the original court receives the order of remand, not from any earlier event in the federal proceeding.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much time does a defendant get to respond after a case is remanded from federal court?
Section 430.90 generally gives 30 days from the original court's receipt of the case on remand, whether the defendant is answering, demurring, or moving to quash, stay, or dismiss.
What date starts the 30-day clock under § 430.90?
Subdivision (b) starts the clock on the date the original court receives the order of remand, not the date of the federal court's remand ruling itself.
Can a defendant demur after a case is remanded if similar issues were already litigated in federal court?
Not if a demurrer or motion to strike raising the same or similar issues was already filed and ruled on before removal or in federal court before remand — § 430.90(a)(2)(B) forecloses that option.
Amendment History
Added by Stats. 1995, Ch. 796, Sec. 5. Effective January 1, 1996.