§ 425.19.Special Motions to Strike In Actions Regarding Priority Housing Development Project
Title 6. Of the Pleadings In Civil Actions · Chapter 2. Pleadings Demanding Relief · Article 1. General Provisions · Enacted 2023 · no amendments on record · Last verified July 28, 2026
Full Text of § 425.19
Plain-English Summary
Section 425.19 is a purpose-built variation on the anti-SLAPP framework, aimed at a different target: lawsuits that challenge the approval or permitting of a priority housing development project, defined in subdivision (c) as a development in which all of the units (apart from any manager's units) are reserved for lower income households for at least 55 years. Subdivision (a) states the Legislature's finding that the lack of affordable housing is a critical problem and that these developments should not be unnecessarily delayed or defeated through abuse of the judicial process, directing that the section be construed broadly.
The mechanics track § 425.16 closely but flip the practical direction of the fight: a defendant in an action challenging a priority housing project's approval — including a challenge brought under Public Resources Code § 21167, the CEQA judicial-review provision — may bring a special motion to strike the whole or part of the pleading. The court must deny the motion if the plaintiff establishes a probability of prevailing, based on the pleadings, supporting and opposing affidavits, and, where the case requires review of an administrative record, that record once it is prepared. If the court needs the administrative record to decide the motion, subdivision (b)(1)(C) lets the moving party file the motion within 60 days after that record is served, rather than within 60 days of the complaint, and without triggering an appeal of a denial under paragraph (7) in the interim.
The rest of the section mirrors § 425.16's structure directly: a finding that the plaintiff met the probability-of-prevailing standard is inadmissible later and does not shift any burden of proof; a prevailing defendant recovers attorney's fees and costs, while a frivolous or delay-driven motion shifts fees to the plaintiff under § 128.5; enforcement actions brought by specified public prosecutors are exempt; the ordinary motion must be filed within 60 days of service of the complaint with a hearing set within 30 days; discovery is automatically stayed upon filing, subject to a good-cause exception; the defined terms extend to cross-complaints and cross-defendants; and an order granting or denying the motion is immediately appealable under § 904.1.
Frequently Asked Questions
What kind of lawsuits does § 425.19's special motion to strike target?
Section 425.19(b)(1)(A) applies to civil actions challenging the approval or permitting of a priority housing development project, including actions brought under Public Resources Code § 21167.
What must happen for the court to deny a § 425.19 special motion to strike?
Section 425.19(b)(1)(A) requires the court to deny the motion if it determines that the plaintiff has established a probability of prevailing on the claim, based on the pleadings and supporting and opposing affidavits, and, where relevant, the administrative record.
What counts as a priority housing development under this section?
Section 425.19(c) defines it as a development in which 100 percent of the units, apart from any manager's unit or units, will be reserved for lower income households, as defined in Health and Safety Code § 50079.5, for at least 55 years.
Is discovery stayed once a § 425.19 motion is filed?
Yes. Section 425.19(b)(5) automatically stays all discovery proceedings upon the filing of the notice of motion, remaining in effect until the ruling is final, unless the court orders specified discovery for good cause.
How does § 425.19 differ from the ordinary anti-SLAPP motion under § 425.16?
Both share the same discovery stay, fee-shifting, and appeal framework, but § 425.19 is limited to challenges to priority housing development approvals and requires the court to deny the motion (rather than grant it) once the plaintiff shows a probability of prevailing, since here the moving defendant is the party defending the housing approval.
Amendment History
Added by Stats 2023 ch 779 (SB 439),s 1, eff. 1/1/2024.