RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 413.30.No Provision Made In Chapter Or Other Law For Service of Summons

Title 5. Jurisdiction and Service of Process · Chapter 4. Service of Summons · Article 1. General · Last amended 2026 · Last verified July 28, 2026

In one sentenceSection 413.30 lets a court order an alternative method of service — including by email or other electronic means — reasonably calculated to give a defendant actual notice, when no statute covers the situation or reasonably diligent efforts under the authorized methods have failed, except in actions against a governmental entity.

Full Text of § 413.30

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b)

(1) If no provision is made in this chapter or other law for the service of summons, or if a plaintiff, despite exercising reasonable diligence, has been unable to effect service of the summons by any of the methods authorized under this chapter, the court in which the action is pending may, upon motion, direct that summons be served in a manner that is reasonably calculated to give actual notice to the party to be served, including by electronic mail or other electronic technology, and that proof of such service be made as prescribed by the court.
(2) A plaintiff seeking to establish reasonable diligence under this section shall set forth facts detailing all attempts to serve the defendant by each of the methods prescribed by statute, including facts demonstrating why each method was unsuccessful at every address or location where the defendant is likely to be found.
(b) This section does not apply in an action against a governmental entity or an agent or employee of the governmental entity who has been sued in an official or individual capacity.

Plain-English Summary

Section 413.30 is the fallback when the specific service methods in this chapter do not work or do not fit the situation. Subdivision (a)(1) lets the court, on motion, direct that summons be served in a manner reasonably calculated to give actual notice to the party to be served — including by electronic mail or other electronic technology — with proof of service made as the court prescribes. This applies when no provision in this chapter or other law covers service on the particular defendant, or when the plaintiff has exercised reasonable diligence but still has been unable to effect service by any of the chapter’s authorized methods.

Subdivision (a)(2) requires more than a bare assertion of difficulty: a plaintiff seeking to establish reasonable diligence must set forth facts detailing every attempt made to serve the defendant by each statutory method, including why each attempt failed at every address or location where the defendant is likely to be found. Subdivision (b) carves out an exception — this section does not apply in an action against a governmental entity or an agent or employee of one sued in an official or individual capacity.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a California court let me serve a defendant by email?

Yes, in the circumstances § 413.30(a)(1) describes. The court may, on motion, direct service by electronic mail or other electronic technology when it is reasonably calculated to give actual notice and either no other provision covers the situation or diligent efforts under the authorized methods have failed.

What do I have to show the court to get an order for alternative service?

Subdivision (a)(2) requires facts detailing every attempt to serve the defendant by each method authorized by statute, including why each attempt failed at every address or location where the defendant is likely to be found.

Does this alternative-service option apply to lawsuits against government agencies?

No. Subdivision (b) states this section does not apply in an action against a governmental entity or an agent or employee of a governmental entity sued in an official or individual capacity.

Amendment History

Amended by Stats 2025 ch 403 (SB 85),s 1, eff. 1/1/2026. Added by Stats. 1969, Ch. 1610.

Source & verification. Section text is reproduced verbatim from the Deering's California Codes Annotated / vLex. Enacted by the California Legislature. Last verified July 28, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: court ordered alternative service californiaserve defendant by email california court orderno provision for service california summonsreasonable diligence service of process california