§ 413.30.No Provision Made In Chapter Or Other Law For Service of Summons
Title 5. Jurisdiction and Service of Process · Chapter 4. Service of Summons · Article 1. General · Last amended 2026 · Last verified July 28, 2026
Full Text of § 413.30
Plain-English Summary
Section 413.30 is the fallback when the specific service methods in this chapter do not work or do not fit the situation. Subdivision (a)(1) lets the court, on motion, direct that summons be served in a manner reasonably calculated to give actual notice to the party to be served — including by electronic mail or other electronic technology — with proof of service made as the court prescribes. This applies when no provision in this chapter or other law covers service on the particular defendant, or when the plaintiff has exercised reasonable diligence but still has been unable to effect service by any of the chapter’s authorized methods.
Subdivision (a)(2) requires more than a bare assertion of difficulty: a plaintiff seeking to establish reasonable diligence must set forth facts detailing every attempt made to serve the defendant by each statutory method, including why each attempt failed at every address or location where the defendant is likely to be found. Subdivision (b) carves out an exception — this section does not apply in an action against a governmental entity or an agent or employee of one sued in an official or individual capacity.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a California court let me serve a defendant by email?
Yes, in the circumstances § 413.30(a)(1) describes. The court may, on motion, direct service by electronic mail or other electronic technology when it is reasonably calculated to give actual notice and either no other provision covers the situation or diligent efforts under the authorized methods have failed.
What do I have to show the court to get an order for alternative service?
Subdivision (a)(2) requires facts detailing every attempt to serve the defendant by each method authorized by statute, including why each attempt failed at every address or location where the defendant is likely to be found.
Does this alternative-service option apply to lawsuits against government agencies?
No. Subdivision (b) states this section does not apply in an action against a governmental entity or an agent or employee of a governmental entity sued in an official or individual capacity.
Amendment History
Amended by Stats 2025 ch 403 (SB 85),s 1, eff. 1/1/2026. Added by Stats. 1969, Ch. 1610.